Raising the Bet after x losing hands on 8 deck CSM

[haxen]

Is there any value in raising the bet after say 5 (or x) losing hands in an 8 deck CSM game, S17, 3:2, DAS game?

I understand that each hand is discreet in CSM, is there anything statistically unlikely to lose x hands in a row?

I am prepared to be flamed, just asking.

thank you

[DSchles]

NO!

Don

[Three]

I understand that each hand is discreet in CSM, is there anything statistically unlikely to lose x hands in a row?

Never.

[CountinCanadian]

A coin lands heads 5 times in a row. Does that mean it's more likely to land tails on the next flip? No! It's still 50/50

[Sharky]

Is there any value in raising the bet after say 5 (or x) losing hands in an 8 deck CSM game, S17, 3:2, DAS game?

I understand that each hand is discreet in CSM, is there anything statistically unlikely to lose x hands in a row?

I am prepared to be flamed, just asking.

thank you

Perhaps you are due!?!?...be sure to check your astrological forecast and moon position.

[Meistro123]

is there anything statistically unlikely to lose x hands in a row?

Of course losing multiple hands in a row is unlikely, but having lost multiple hands in a row, losing one more is just as likely as losing a hand ever is. You can't profitably bet with or against streaks, instead you must bet with advantage.

[Letangs]

You can answer to yourself.
Just use a coin.

Pretend it just landed on the face ten times.
Flip it again.
What are the odds it lands on a face a eleventh time ?

[stopgambling]

yeah , if you win the next bet . what you are actually doing is using one " big" bet to hopefully catch up your previous lost( many ploppies do that ) . What if you lose a few more bets with a much higher amount of $$ As everyone already told you here . You are not more likely to win even after losing several hands .

[blue_phantom]

Gambler’s fallacy.
You are a gambler in the wrong forum .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[stopgambling]

You talking about me ? BLUE phanthom ? I am just explaining what he is trying to do.

[blue_phantom]

You talking about me ? BLUE phanthom ? I am just explaining what he is trying to do.

Obviously I’m referring to OP who’s displaying classic gambler’s fallacy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk