See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 44

Thread: very depressing variance, what are the odds?

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    very depressing variance, what are the odds?

    so i have been playing this game in some casino in asia for a month now. the HE is really good.

    4D
    S17
    RSA
    DAS
    LS
    50%
    $1-$500

    there is absolutely no heat at all. i have been playing $1 x2hands, spreading $50x2, $75x2, $100x2...up to $500x2.

    i won $12500 for the first 2 weeks then lost $13000 in last 2 weeks. since this was in a private casino, i feel like they cheated. it was so weird that the first 2 weeks i was on winning streak every day then all of sudden, the game is changed and i could only won 2 days out of last 14 days. it took me about 7000 rounds to win the first $12500 and then 5000 rounds to lose the $13000. what are the chances though? do you guys think they cheated or is this just one of the million variance?

    edit: i used zen count with full indices.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    you have no idea of what variance means . you only had about 125 hours of play if i read your post right . you have not mention your spread and count system and bet ramp .

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by stopgambling View Post
    you have no idea of what variance means . you only had about 125 hours of play if i read your post right . you have not mention your spread and count system and bet ramp .
    TC=1 $1 x 2hands
    TC=2 $50 x 2hands
    TC=3 $75 x 2hands
    TC=4 $100 x 2hands

    increase the bet by $25 up to $500 x 2hands.

    i used zen with full indices.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by hwjman View Post
    TC=1 $1 x 2hands
    TC=2 $50 x 2hands
    TC=3 $75 x 2hands
    TC=4 $100 x 2hands

    increase the bet by $25 up to $500 x 2hands.

    i used zen with full indices.
    If your tc 4 is 2x100, and your max is 2-500, I guarantee you that your spread is fucked up, and you’re getting clobbered with occasional bets above +4.

    Get cvcx, plug in the variables, and fix your problem.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    You have played an insignificant amount of time to make any conclusions, but the swings sound normal. If you think you are being cheated don't play there. Do you have any reason to suspect cheating besides the fact that you don't understand the normal ebb and flow of your BR when playing a 100:1 spread?

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Three View Post
    You have played an insignificant amount of time to make any conclusions, but the swings sound normal. If you think you are being cheated don't play there. Do you have any reason to suspect cheating besides the fact that you don't understand the normal ebb and flow of your BR when playing a 100:1 spread?

    I almost suspect that tc 4 is 2x100, and tc 5 is 2x250 or 2x500. His problem is fixable.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    I almost suspect that tc 4 is 2x100, and tc 5 is 2x250 or 2x500. His problem is fixable.
    sorry, let me clairfy this here.

    as the tc increases by 1, i raised my bet by $25 on each hand.

    here is the full chart.

    TC=1 $1 x 2hands
    TC=2 $50 x 2hands
    TC=3 $75 x 2hands
    TC=4 $100 x 2hands
    TC=5 $125 x 2hands
    TC=6 $150 x 2hands
    TC=7 $175 x 2hands
    TC=8 $200 x 2hands
    TC=9 $225 x 2hands
    TC=10 $250 x 2hands
    TC=11 $275 x 2hands
    TC=12 $300 x 2hands
    TC=13 $325 x 2hands
    TC=14 $350 x 2hands
    TC=15 $375 x 2hands
    TC=16 $400 x 2hands
    TC=17 $425 x 2hands
    TC=18 $450 x 2hands
    TC=19 $475 x 2hands
    TC=20 $500 x 2hands

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    So, with 50% pen on a 4 deck game, You’re really getting tc 20?

    Firstly, your tc 1 bet is way to low, and should be reserved for off the top and negative counts. Second your strategy of adding 25 per true count is flawed, especially at plus 2,3 and 4. Third, I question your frequency if bets that would allow for 400 and 500 bets based on your schedule and 50% pen.

    I don’t know your bankroll, but you should$ re-evaluate your strategies. Further, if yo7 really believe the casino is cheating, which is questionable, quit playing.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    So, with 50% pen on a 4 deck game, You’re really getting tc 20?

    Firstly, your tc 1 bet is way to low, and should be reserved for off the top and negative counts. Second your strategy of adding 25 per true count is flawed, especially at plus 2,3 and 4. Third, I question your frequency if bets that would allow for 400 and 500 bets based on your schedule and 50% pen.

    I don’t know your bankroll, but you should$ re-evaluate your strategies. Further, if yo7 really believe the casino is cheating, which is questionable, quit playing.
    so how should my bet look like? i came up with this bet size because their max bet is $500 and i wanted to spread to 20. during the 12000 hands, the max tc ive seen was 16 and that happened only once. i just planned this to spread 1 to 20. so you are saying i should increase my bet at TC1?

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    so you have broke even? I probably wouldn't play in a "private" casino.

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    1) That’s not a 1 to 20 spread... If you ever get to put out 2x500, then that’s like a 1 to 500 spread.

    2) Considering you're betting 2x200/250 around TC 9/10 Zen Count, your fluctuations are normal.

    3) Have no idea what your bankroll is or what RoR you’re comfortable with, so without that info, it’s hard to say what your “ideal” max bet should be.

    4) Your “real max bet” is going to be put out around TC 8 or 9 for Zen. Anything above TC 9, I would probably consider it a “super max.”

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I'm not a Zen expert, but since it is a level-2 count, I would think that the first advantage would occur at TC +3 or 4. So you might be raising your bet prematurely.

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigdaddy View Post
    I'm not a Zen expert, but since it is a level-2 count, I would think that the first advantage would occur at TC +3 or 4. So you might be raising your bet prematurely.
    Depends on the game. Each TC is worth approximately .33%. So if you’re playing a DD game that has H17, DAS, then you’ll have a small edge at +2. But if you’re playing a 6D shoe with H17, DAS, and no RSA, then you won’t have an edge until +3. So as you can see, it’s circumstantial.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Depressing report from A.C.
    By ZenMaster_Flash in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-10-2017, 08:01 AM
  2. Expect MORE Positive Variance than NEG Variance?
    By Mickey in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-26-2014, 12:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.