See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 50

Thread: Was My Thinking Flawed

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Was My Thinking Flawed

    Not too long ago I found myself on the last day of a multi-day blackjack trip. The trip was not going well, but this day of the trip would determine if I would have a winning or losing trip. Pretty much from the start on this last day things were not looking good. I would win some big bets and lose some, but it was mostly a downward slide. I found myself down hundreds of dollars with only a couple hours left to play.

    To make matters worse, playing conditions were deteriorating. The table was filling up and soon there was a full table. There were always at least 6 or 7 players at the table, and we would only get 3 hands before shuffle (50% pen). At this point I assumed I would have a losing trip.

    However, I pretty much just sat there and played table min. I wasn't losing, but was slowly making a comeback. Then suddenly the opportunity for a big bet arose. If I was playing heads up of even with one or two other players I would have made a large bet. However, my thinking was since there were so many other players at the table the good hands would end up going to someone else. There would not be another hand. From years of experience I have not done well playing with crowded conditions.

    Anyway, I did make a large bet, but it was only about half the size I normally would make if I had decent conditions. I did win the hand, but if I had my normal large bet out there it would have been enough to bring me into the black. I was still down and in the red with time running out. So my question is did I have the same advantage with so many players at the table as I would have if playing heads up or with only one other person?

    PS. In the last few minutes of playing time left I did win enough to bring me slightly better then break even. The trip turned out to be good enough to go on the books as a winner, but not enough to cover all expenses.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Yes, your thinking was flawed.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Midwest Player View Post
    PS. In the last few minutes of playing time left I did win enough to bring me slightly better then break even. The trip turned out to be good enough to go on the books as a winner, but not enough to cover all expenses.
    Thanks for sharing that earth-shattering experience.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Ploppy voodoo talk.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I'd still consider that to be a losing trip. You lost money on it.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Midwest Player View Post
    So my question is did I have the same advantage with so many players at the table as I would have if playing heads up or with only one other person?
    Same advantage. The crowd eats advantage rounds and advantage cards but none of that matters on the last round before a shuffle.
    Quote Originally Posted by Midwest Player View Post
    PS. In the last few minutes of playing time left I did win enough to bring me slightly better then break even. The trip turned out to be good enough to go on the books as a winner, but not enough to cover all expenses.
    Is this tournament play? Counting doesn't help much in a tournament because you are playing for the short term so long term results are irrelevant and you are playing against the other players rather than the house. Both optimal playing strategy and optimal betting strategy are based on beating your opponents rather than winning the most money in the long run.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Think of it this way. Your dollars won per 100 hands is virtually the same with a full VS empty table. However your dollars won per hour takes a nose dive - because hands per hour played takes a nose dive.

    Unless you had some other reason not disclosed, you underbet hand. Further, why are you playing a centre cut double deck with 4 players.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Midwest Player View Post
    I found myself down hundreds of dollars with only a couple hours left to play.

    To make matters worse, playing conditions were deteriorating. The table was filling up and soon there was a full table. There were always at least 6 or 7 players at the table, and we would only get 3 hands before shuffle (50% pen). At this point I assumed I would have a losing trip.
    Your main concern is only if you made a mistake with the half-max bet? I think you have a few other problems that need attention.
    Last edited by BoSox; 09-19-2018 at 05:19 PM.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    You were playing a DD game cut 50% and there were 7 players at the table? Why were you even playing? You were probably getting well less than 50 rounds per hour and a complete waste of time sitting there. Work on game selection, dont sacrifice game quality for the sake of getting rounds in. In this case you were not getting many.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by dalmatian View Post
    Did Zee hack Midwest player's profile? wtf
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmybond007 View Post
    You were playing a DD game cut 50% and there were 7 players at the table? Why were you even playing?
    Even Zee knows better. Is MWP the new Zee?

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It sounds like he was playing a tournament and needed to make a lot more to finish in the money. If so he should have bet everything he had. The correct answer if it was a tournament was to bet enough to finish in the money and start betting very aggressively as early as you need to in order to accomplish that goal. Most tournaments don't play with real money (they use funny money chips that have no cash value) but if this tournament used real money, some do, then the issue of winning or losing chips that could be cashed in for money at the end of the tournament might be factored in.

  12. #12


    0 out of 3 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    T#, the lies and distortions are below you. I did not say anything that you imply. I DO NOT TELL OTHERS HOW TO PLAY OR CALL OTHERS STUPID. I said that I did okay despite the fact that I did not networking, did not take up higher counts, did not buy software, practice, etc. I DO NOT TELLK OTHERS WHAT TO DO. I said that I had a winning record and that all those things were not REQUIRED. There is a difference between saying that one can get by.

    Myt point is that recreational, part time players do not need to spend all that time and money if their goals are limited and they have no particular desire to invest a lot of time and money into this hobby. Do you get it?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Pit 3 BJ4
    Posts
    863


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeeBabar View Post
    Myt point is that recreational, part time players do not need to spend all that time and money if their goals are limited and they have no particular desire to invest a lot of time and money into this hobby. Do you get it?
    Three seems to want validation very badly, and he seems to have a need to slur those do not agree with him. My way or the highway.

    Not everyone has the same goals. Some want to make a living playing cards, some want comps and free vacations, some just want to tell others what to do.

    There are many destinations and many roads that will get one there.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Is my system flawed?
    By dalmatian in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-22-2017, 10:38 AM
  2. Blink: Thinking Without Thinking... At Cards
    By zengrifter in forum The Disadvantage Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-21-2012, 09:15 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.