And I thought CSM were bad for BJ plus progression systems did not work. Now I am confused.
What a scene! Fecking legend!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI3qQBn6lQ
can you please tell more about it? i have been studying one2six with the actual machine at my place. find my post on this forum to see the discussion about it. i know the clumps happen but i can't come up with a proper strategy to beat it.
if you want to talk more about it, please send me an email.
[email protected]
Every machine I have played against up to this point has appeared nothing but normal to me and was reflected in my results. There is no need to figure out how to beat a crooked machine something that I have never seen before, and frankly question its existence in the first place. Some players claim they have seen first-hand crooked machines in action. I seriously question the validity of these theories but just for discussion say it is possible. Obviously using a normal published card counting system will not work. I would study not only the size of the patterns but when they APPEAR as the machine itself would have limitations on its capabilities. For this reason alone I think this is all hogwash.
Deviru, since you have your own machine and cannot see anything yourself inside that can distinguish the value of the cards which it is the only way it could cheat. I would think that if the machine could do this it would be programmed in a microchip. Any chance of proving your theories you are going to need a top-notch techie to further evaluate your machine.
Last edited by BoSox; 08-28-2018 at 05:10 AM.
Between the lines, I think you are saying that players should be aware that possibilities do exist to set the cards coming out of these machines into patterns at the casinos' discretion. Maybe the board should have a poll from players who play against these machines asking them if they believe they are playing against a truly random game, or not, or unsure.
I also play a lot on ASM and have seen all kinds of shit happen, but the same can be said for hand shuffle games. One person's opinion is rather meaningless as the sample size is way too small. I will say that because the possibility exist is very disturbing to say the least.
Bookmarks