Strange Strategy against ASM

[JamesonDetroit]

If I ever encounter a beast mode shuffler (which I am not convinced exist) that does the alleged clumping of nearly-exclusively 10s that also allows for a LL (or similar) sidebet, you better believe I'll be hitting that table hard. I'm guessing casinos wouldn't combine the two though, if they're smart (of course, a debatable point).

But I think there is enough EV there that if I ever am even slightly suspicious, I'll be backcounting quite a few shoes (by reports here, the high TC is incredibly consistent; shouldn't take long) to try and confirm. Hmm... I wonder if I can simulate this theoretical goldmine. Actually, has anyone here simmed the alleged Beast Mode (if it were to exist) just in general?

[BJGenius007]

If I ever encounter a beast mode shuffler (which I am not convinced exist) that does the alleged clumping of nearly-exclusively 10s that also allows for a LL (or similar) sidebet, you better believe I'll be hitting that table hard. I'm guessing casinos wouldn't combine the two though, if they're smart (of course, a debatable point).

But I think there is enough EV there that if I ever am even slightly suspicious, I'll be backcounting quite a few shoes (by reports here, the high TC is incredibly consistent; shouldn't take long) to try and confirm. Hmm... I wonder if I can simulate this theoretical goldmine. Actually, has anyone here simmed the alleged Beast Mode (if it were to exist) just in general?

That is what I thought. If you read my earlier posts, you would know face card clump happened when RC is in negative 10 to negative 25 range. When RC is very positive, I never got paid playing Lucky Lady. That is because face card rich preceding face card clump.