Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Conceptual Question for the Masters

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Conceptual Question for the Masters

    I've been using CVCX for several months and now have CVData (of which the mounds of generated data is fantastic). My question is this: with my parameters, playing, and betting strategies set, CVData shows my hand winning percentage (without ties) tops 50% at TC=7 and greater. To me this should mean minimum bets at TC=7. Yet CVCX's optimum betting results (with same parameters) shows max bet starting at TC=>2. (And indeed, when I set the custom bets in CVCX to min =7, the results are horrible). It appears that I'm missing a basic concept here. Again, it seems that I should not be betting max bet until my hand percentage win rate tops 50%. What am I missing????? (BTW, I am using carriage return, not sure why my posts all run together). -NN

  2. #2
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    You are rarely betting with a win rate > 50%.
    You are ignoring the increased rate of Blackjacks
    and improved results on doubles with a HIGH T.C.

    You want to be Max Betting when you have a 2%
    advantage. Depending on the Table Conditions and
    the House Edge, that will probably be at T.C. +5 or
    +6 with a simple Level One Count.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    You need to look at frequency of count. Generally speaking only about 12-15% of your rounds in a six deck game will be at TC+2 or greater. So, while your "edge" may increase exponentially, your opportunities are dwindling exponentially.

    You sims will likely be horrible if max bet = TC+7.
    Luck is nothing more than probability taken personally!

  4. #4
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    NOTE: In a BJ game with poor penetration the frequency of reaching (your) Strike Point

    is LOW compared to a game with fewer decks and deeper penetration. The relationship is

    perfectly linear. Learn to look for acceptable Table Conditions. The rules in effect must be

    considered AFTER you know the number of decks, and most importantly what level of

    penetration you can expect.


  5. #5


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Zen Master has the correct answer.

    In a nutshell, you need to be looking at % edge/ROI on a hand for what you're looking for.

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Nascent Norm View Post
    CVData shows my hand winning percentage (without ties) tops 50% at TC=7 and greater. To me this should mean minimum bets at TC=7. Yet CVCX's optimum betting results (with same parameters) shows max bet starting at TC=>2.
    I think you meant maximum where you said minimum above.

    The TC where CVCX will recommend your max bet depends on your spread. The bigger the spread, the more intermediate bets there will be and the higher the TC for your max bet will be.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Nascent Norm View Post
    It appears that I'm missing a basic concept here.
    Yes.
    Look at https://www.blackjackincolor.com/truecount5.htm

    Don, suis-je le seul à avoir compris la question ? Ou mon anglais me trahit-il ?

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    "You are ignoring the increased rate of Blackjacks and improved results on doubles with a HIGH T.C.". Thanks Zenmaster; after thinking about it, I can see how both of these are correct even when my winning hand percentage is under 50%. "I think you meant maximum where you said minimum above." Thanks Gronbog, you are exactly correct, that was a typo. "Don, suis-je le seul à avoir compris la question ? Ou mon anglais me trahit-il ? " Thanks Phoebe for the link, I will check it out. Meanwhile, me no speako la french. -NN

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I said "Was I am the only to understood the question ?"
    I mean that IMO all other answers are right but don't answer your question.

    Only at +7, you win more hands that you lose.
    That what you ignored and why you asked the question.

    Second sentence in French is to said that I really could had misunderstood your question.
    Last edited by Phoebe; 05-31-2018 at 12:54 PM.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks Phoebe. Yes I think zen master was the most direct in answering my question

Similar Threads

  1. ES: Masters of Blackjack
    By ES in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-04-2007, 08:17 AM
  2. suicyco maniac: Question for the masters
    By suicyco maniac in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-07-2004, 03:36 AM
  3. Boris: Q for Masters
    By Boris in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-03-2003, 02:22 PM
  4. Boris: Q for Masters
    By Boris in forum International Scene
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-09-2003, 06:20 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-11-2002, 09:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.