Just read the following online article, and was wondering how people on this forum perceive the industry's efforts.
https://www.cdcgamingreports.com/com...e-information/
Do you read it as written, being a review of industry efforts to improve table game monitoring to better tailor casino marketing efforts for players, or.....?
"Your honor, with all due respect: if you're going to try my case for me, I wish you wouldn't lose it."
Fictitious Boston Attorney Frank Galvin (Paul Newman - January 26, 1925 - September 26, 2008) in The Verdict, 1982, lambasting Trial Judge Hoyle (Milo Donal O'Shea - June 2, 1926 - April 2, 2013) - http://imdb.com/title/tt0084855/
That is very interesting. I wonder if the software they are using to track betting could also keep track of a count to correlate bet sizes with counting... If it can't, I think it's only a matter of time. A casino can determine fairly accurately the likelihood someone at their tables are counting... which would make a good cover strategy more important.
Given a big enough data set (and I imagine not *that* big, given the accuracy of machine learning and the simplicity of bet ramps, and card counting in general, from a computer's perspective), they'll not be throwing many non-APs out for winning by luck. On the contrary, they'll be able to confirm with some certainty that a ploppy did simply win by luck, and not advantage play. It will be the counters who have been good at camouflage against humans that will need to figure out how to win and have the patterns make it look like luck. I'm actually not sure it can be done long term except by strategies that allow for flat betting (e.g. BP team play) or generous opposition betting.
Will certainly be interesting to see how this unfolds. Certainly has my brain grapes working...
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by GolfShark
Bookmarks