Originally Posted by
Freightman
So, what we were initially told, as well as what we know, is as follows.
He pulls the trigger at plus 2, spreading 1x15 to 7x200.
He does not know indices.
Forgetting an implied strategy, which he is clearly not good enough for, let's just assume the normal parameters of greed, and apply his strategy accordingly. To emphasize the example, I'll create a scenario.
Bushie is playing his single square game when, all of a sudden, his table mate - numb nuts, at the stroke of true 2.0, spreads from 15 to 7x200. We are now starting deck 5 of a 5.5 dealt shoe, so we know, for sure (playing hi lo) that they're 2 more face cards than low cards. Numb nuts, since he does not have a handle on indices, for sure has no concept of the middle card groupings. Hand 1 produces a 20, against dealers upcard of 10. RC is minus 1. He has 6 more hands, with no evidence being presented of shuffle tracking, or depth charging skill (not properly applied anyways) for that matter. We don't know WHEATHER hi or lo cards are coming out - we now know, however, that the rest of the hands aRe at a disadvantage. In fact, numb nuts is in the middle of a crap shoot, and he's just increased his exposure 95 times on a potential one time event.
He's not, in a million years trying to boot Bushie if the table, with that strategy, at true 2.0. The point for dickhead of getting Bushie off the table, is to do so at minimal cost as opposed to vast over exposure.
Further, numb nuts has been previously evaluated, by others as evidenced by the critters indifference, said critter having been told not to sweat the action.
They're other ways that this scenario can be applied valuated, but numb nuts hasn't been he skill. I trust I've made my point.
Bookmarks