Originally Posted by
Freightman
Absolutely no disrespect intended.
I have a philosophy. Discussions start slathered in honey. If honey doesn't work, give rope. Then, if that doesn't work, you give more rope - the language gets sharper, more pointed and direct. All of these steps, and more were followed. All you have to do is check history.
Now, on the other side of the coin, are 2 individual alphas, with a coalition of lesser inclined subordinates. Allow me to demo the typical newbie inquiry - enhanced, the point if which everyone will get.
Newbie- I want to make some money, what count should I use?
Mentor- unless you use the best system, hi opt 2 with asc, then you're a fucking idiot. Hi lo is inferior and you need an ace neutral count, adjusted, in order to reduce variance and perform well n a lower spread.
Newbie- oh golly gee willickers, hiw can I learn hi Opt 2 with asc.
Mentor- I will teach you, for I am wise and wonderful.
This is not an isolated scenario - it occurs day after day after day. Mind you, it's lessned lately, for some unknown reason.
Then of course, the mutual admiration society kicks in, promoting side by side counts, proffered with paragraph after paragraph of indecipherable minutiae, mostly with dribble of no value to most, spurred by an insatiable need of self justifying g that novellos are required to better explain the point - a man in live with his own keyboard.
That is also daily occurrence. The slathered with honey approach followed by the extension n if rope philosophy doesn't work here either.
So, if you don't like my eventual tactics, that's fine - but if you're true to yourself, then you'll know I'm right - which then begs the question of why you didn't Complain about this bullshit in the first place.
Something will give eventually - might be me, who knows. Hell, I like flash, 3 as well, but enough is enough.
Bookmarks