Yes, monsieur Philippe! Merci bo que!!!
You said your first animated GIF was a joke. WOW!!! You simulated the game S17 DAS the OP's game is an ENHC game. So bet spread would be different. I looked at your first animated GIF and see that you only did a simulation for the same decks and compare it to different players but I don't see a simulation for using the bet spread on a 1 deck cut off game on a 4 player game with 4.5 deck penetration. So it seem like you are skewing your simulation a little bit. I did my own simulation and for the game you simulate. It indeed doesn't make a lot of difference for 1 or 4 players but you are using it on the same penetration. But what about different penetration and different players and you use the bet spread you are using from a 1 deck cut off game.
Here is my simulations and it show it does make a difference:
Bet Spreads for 83% penetration
REKO 1 Player 5 decks.jpg
Bet spreads from 83% used on 75% game with 4 players
REKO 4 Player 4.5 decks.jpg
Last edited by seriousplayer; 11-19-2017 at 08:35 AM.
For lesser deck cut off the bet spread make more difference to the number of players. Here is the simulations:
Bet spread for 4.5 deck cut off one player
REKO 4.5 decks 1 player.jpg
Bet spread for 4.5 one player used on 4 players
REKO 4.5 decks 4 player.jpg
Bet spread for 4 deck cut off one player
REKO 4 decks 1 player.jpg
Bet spread for 4 decks one player used on 4 players
REKO 4 decks 4 player.jpg
As the penetration get lower bet spread is more dependent on the amount of players. If I were to do simulations for 2, 3, 5 or 6 players. The bet spread would show even more changes. Changing the indices for REKO also changes the bet spread.
Last edited by seriousplayer; 11-19-2017 at 09:06 AM.
Bookmarks