See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 36

Thread: Deck estimation practice

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Deck estimation practice

    What is the best way to practice deck estimation? Do you find the discard tray in CVBJ to be realistic enough or have you also bought decks to practice with?

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Get six decks of cards and number them from 1-312 with a magic marker. Then use a cut card to cut an arbitrary numbers of cards over and over until you can do it within +/- 3 cards accuracy.

    Gamblers Book Store las vegas or their website for real casino cards.

    Note cards can have very different thickness, some off by as much as 3/4 deck when compared. Be careful.

    Having the wrong count is really bad, but having the wrong number of decks to determine TC is likely more prevalent and more dangerous.
    Luck is nothing more than probability taken personally!

  3. #3


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Find a make shift discard rack, on the back side use some masking tape, mark off half deck measurements up to six or eight decks. Then put a bunch of cards randomly into the discard rack, and really try to size it up, then look at the tape on the back to see how close you are. A couple of hrs of that, and you should be a pro.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    +1 for both poster's advice. Is that +2?

    L.O.L.

    If you have good vision, the learning

    curve is shallow and short. You'll improve.

    If you have nothing important to do ...

    Practice the advice above. Keep it up.

    Naturally, you go nowhere without 1

    or 2 decks of cards in your pocket(s.)

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Also, understand that differently casinos use cards if different thickness. Further, if the house doesn't change cards frequently, then you also have to take deck expansion into effect. So, for practice in a specific store, get 6 decks if used cards, as previously mentioned, mark them 1 to 312, and start practicing.

    Further, use that stores chips and see how many stacked to equal 1 deck, 2 decks etc. Then, make allowances for deck expansion........you should get the point.

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Also, understand that differently casinos use cards if different thickness. Further, if the house doesn't change cards frequently, then you also have to take deck expansion into effect. So, for practice in a specific store, get 6 decks if used cards, as previously mentioned, mark them 1 to 312, and start practicing.

    Further, use that stores chips and see how many stacked to equal 1 deck, 2 decks etc. Then, make allowances for deck expansion........you should get the point.
    A bit more on a variant of this point.
    True on a shoe with a notch, more noticeable on a double deck shoe with a notch - observe the amount of pressure used by the dealer on the 2 decks, and note the difference in position of cut card on heavy pressure versus light pressure.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    All of the above, plus you asked a question about the CVBJ practice discard tray. It may not be enough by itself, but CVBJ is helpful in conjunction with the things mentioned previously. It can help with speed of decision making and how to look at the discard tray and sub-divide it in your mind.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealth View Post
    Get six decks of cards and number them from 1-312 with a magic marker. Then use a cut card to cut an arbitrary numbers of cards over and over until you can do it within +/- 3 cards accuracy.
    Shuffle and shuffle the cards over and over and then do this. If you do not, you will be able to see the breaks in the decks.

    Arnold Snyder's Shuffle Tracking Cookbook gives great advice on how to set all this up.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Jabberwocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Agharta
    Posts
    1,868


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Or use REKO-F and not bother.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Tarzan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Atlantic City
    Posts
    1,013


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Playing card thickness can vary, but quite often the same playing card company makes cards for multiple casinos. If you see (look on the Ace of spades) that the card manufacturer for the Stardust is US Playing Card Co. out of Cincinnati, Ohio and you have practiced and played with other cards from US playing Card Co., it's about .29mm thickness, the mid range of specs and you acclimate to it, etc.

    Take six decks and gauge whole decks, making six stacks of 52 each. Take a single deck and split in half for two stacks of 26 each, in half again for two stacks of 13 each. Count out the stacks (or push them up to each other side by side) to see how accurate your estimate was. It doesn't take much practice to come within a card or two of the exact, 13, 26, 39, or 52 cards.
    Last edited by Tarzan; 11-07-2017 at 03:17 PM.

  11. #11
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Beware of Gemaco™ brand cards as they are perhaps the thinnest of all.

    Significantly thinner than Aristocrat™ or Bee™ brands of playing cards.

    Just yesterday, I was obliged to point out these factors to a PA player.


  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarzan View Post

    Take six decks and gauge whole decks, making six stacks of 52 each. Take a single deck and split in half for two stacks of 26 each, in half again for two stacks of 13 each. Count out the stacks (or push them up to each other side by side) to see how accurate you estimate was. It doesn't take much practice to come within a card or two of the exact, 13, 26, 39, or 52 cards.
    I built a "staircase" of cards, each step is 1/2 deck so when I look at that staircase know how each 1/2 deck increment look like. You can build 1/4 increment steps if you want.

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenMaster_Flash View Post

    Beware of Gemaco™ brand cards as they are perhaps the thinnest of all.

    Significantly thinner than Aristocrat™ or Bee™ brands of playing cards.

    Just yesterday, I was obliged to point out these factors to a PA player.

    How do you tell if the card brands are from Gemaco when the cards a played out? I did notice that some casinos uses cards that are thinner to thwart card counters. I hope in the future we will have the option to program cards thinness in Casino Verite so we don't have to go through the hassle of worrying that your deck estimation.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Deck Estimation standard in Double Deck
    By vhalen in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-22-2016, 09:10 AM
  2. Deck estimation.
    By Pacman in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-28-2014, 01:55 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-09-2005, 11:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.