If we agree on this ...
Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
I fully agree that the best way to work out this problem is, as you wrote, using the "value" of the coupon as the amount of additional live money you can expect to have in your pocket after the process of using the coupon has been resolved
then you cannot believe these ...
Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
YES. Absolutely. When I bet a match play, with a regular bet, I am betting 1.5 units, so when I win, I win 1.5 units.
Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
YES. Absolutely. When I bet a match play, with a regular bet, I am betting 1.5 units, so when I lose, I lose 1.5 units.
They are contradictory.
Once it has been bet, the coupon no more than a reminder to the dealer that the payout structure of the game has been changed.
Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
While I would expect that my surrender strategy (and my forfeit strategy, and the double-down strategy that I generated, but haven't posted in this thread) would be very VERY close to what your simulation shows, I look forward to your results.
I think that you're in for a bit of a rude surprise. I tried applying your surrender model to blackjack and got nothing close to the strategy that Grosjean and I have both independently computed.
Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
Thanks! :-)
My pleasure.