Sharky's NFL play-o-the-weak 2017

[seriousplayer]

Here is what the richest.com says about its own credibility:

https://www.therichest.com/terms-of-use/
2. ACCURACY:
TheRichest is an entertainment based website providing commentary, general information in relation to celebrities, luxury items, athletes, businesspersons, public figures, lifestyles, wealthy individuals, current trends and entertainment. Information on the site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Website does not make any warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the sites content. The Website does not provide any warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy of the information. You acknowledge that such information and materials may contain inaccuracies and errors and we expressly exclude liability for any such inaccuracies or errors.


When the source itself basically confess to being inaccurate and controversial you can dismiss what they say as unreliable.


One thing about vetting a source is looking at the agenda of the source. This source is the fan club of the Ravens biggest rival bitching after the Ravens had knocked the Steelers out of the playoffs. This is really all you need to know about this source even if when he questioned the PI calls the refs make without any pleading from the QB. Good DB's do PI purposely if they deem the results of the penalty is better than the receiver making the catch or they think it necessary and they might get away with it. Obviously with the Ravens speed at wide receiver and one of the strongest deep guns in the league under center they will see more deep interference calls from desperate DB's beaten on the pass route. His not factoring that in shows his bias. His position that the refs is going to give the Ravens more PI calls is ridiculous. The refs call them as they see them. The obvious conclusion is the DBs commit PI more often because if they didn't the consequences would be worse than if they did and they often get away with PI. I would also like to point out that not once in the long long diatribe did the Steeler fan ever point out something that actually is cheating. The irony is around here we know the Ravens get the shit end of the stick both from the refs and the league. They have ever since the Browns moved their team here to become the Ravens.

Did you even read the article? The cheating ranks aren't theirs, but rather are them showing their readers the ridiculous stuff on your teamcheats.com. It called the ranking of the Pats as 23rd in cheating as ridiculous and intimated that the number one of Denver was ridiculous. It gives one cheating scandal for each team in the top 10, except for PED use endorsed by the team physician, the rule breaking they list is very minor compared to cheating that affects what happens on the field, which include pretty much every one of the very numerous Patriot cheating scandals. It is obviously an article intended to lampoon yourteamcheats.com. The cheating scandals for other teams than the Patriots are from decades ago from another football era for the most part but the Patriots cheating is primarily from the modern age of football we are in today. Also Westword is not a sports sight but rather a sensational journalism site. Sports is an afterthought only used to get people to visit their site. Being in Denver something saying the Broncos is the worst cheaters in football would have a spike in website visits. Especially if it hinted at how ridiculous the source it was debunking was.

Yes, I read the article that is why I posted. All two of the cheating site both reference yourteamcheat.com that is why I posted it because I want to see how you going to discredit the two sites. Tell me does any site provide a guaranteed of accuracy of the information even the foxsport site you posted. What you said about the second site was garbage. To keep it brief the site will have to give one cheating scandal for each team that is why they referenced yourteamcheat.com. Even if it does bitch after the Ravens had knocked the Steelers out of the playoffs it doesn't mean the information is not correct.

"The obvious conclusion is the DBs commit PI more often because if they didn't the consequences would be worse than if they did and they often get away with PI."

Regardless they committed a PI no matter how to boil it down. It did say explicitly : "John Harbaugh might say that is cheating."

Westword.com is a newspaper site. Did you even researched the website?? The accuracy for using therichest.com is enough for a discussion just as wikipedia. Maybe not for academics but for a discussion it accurate enough. That is also why I provided two references the westword.com site.