Am I too crazy to hit 12 v 6 on this hand?

[Jack Jackson]

Right now I am assuming the weight of mid card is +2 so modified RC=20-18x2=-16 and modified TC=-8. My question is if the weight of mid card should be +1 in this case then modified RC=20-18=2 and modified TC=-1. Right now, I am assuming weight is +2. But think again, the weight could be {+2, +2, +1, +1, +1} for 12 v {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.

Using a CDCA Program (+2 +2 +1 +1 +1) looks to be about right..The decision is very close, nevertheless..But a TC of -8 for 12v6 is overkill even for Soft 17..Im curous, did you Hit and what was the next card?

Trust me, i know these bizarre plays WITH MAXBETS on the line Lol I remember one time Doublin Ten vs Ten with maxbet and the count tanked to negative but ALL the Aces were left so i went ahead and doubled and nailed it!

Source:http://www.bjstrat.net/cgi-bin/cdca.cgi?

[BJGenius007]

Using a CDCA Program (+2 +2 +1 +1 +1) looks to be about right..The decision is very close, nevertheless..But a TC of -8 for 12v6 is overkill even for Soft 17..Im curous, did you Hit and what was the next card?

Trust me, i know these bizarre plays WITH MAXBETS on the line Lol I remember one time Doublin Ten vs Ten with maxbet and the count tanked to negative but ALL the Aces were left so i went ahead and doubled and nailed it!

Source:http://www.bjstrat.net/cgi-bin/cdca.cgi?

I got a face card and lost my max bet. The shoe ended with eleven mid cards (8 or 9) on the last hand. It further confirms my suspicion that ASM clumps midcards. Since I switched to Zen SC8/9 from Opt2/ASC, I have encountered the similar scenario four times. I got face cards three times and only once got the midcard. In such a scenario, even I knew midcard is super rich, it seems that modifying RC/TC is not wise than just playing Basic Strategy since when the midcards came out, they came out ten or more in a roll. The super riches of mid cards did not increase the odds for me to get one because ten of them are clumped together.