Here is link mentioning that spooking will get your arrested.
https://www.countingedge.com/what-is-hole-carding/
Email: [email protected]
I am curious about this as well...
The Nevada Supreme Court decision didn't issue a specific decision on "spooking".
I always thought it was a gray area that would carry less protection under the Einbinder and Dalben decision vs. being seated at the table in which the cards are being observed.
Last edited by BankerCA; 10-19-2019 at 09:58 PM. Reason: spelling
I don’t have anything in front of me but isn’t holecarding legal because all the info is available to everyone at the table, or some other, better wording of that? At least that’s the spirit of the ruling as I’ve always believed after reading for myself and talking to lawyers.
rxgamble.com
Yes, that is the gist of it. The decision is based on the player simply using the "Powers of Observation" that would have been available to any player in that seat.
Would the court had a different opinion if the "Powers of Observation" were used from across the room?
What about laying your head horizontally 1" from the felt?
Its Possible.
The LINE is drawn somewhere. Where that LINE lays is often a matter of opinion until a decision is issued by a court and case law is established.
It would be my assumption that most lawyers would advise against "Spooking" since to my knowledge there has been no specific case law that specifically addresses it.
In a state that gets a large portion of its income from the gambling industry, it wouldn't surprise to see the District Attorney bring charges for "spooking".
Yeah, I would be curious as to what he has to say.
Last edited by BankerCA; 10-19-2019 at 10:04 PM.
Bookmarks