REKO: more indices ?

**Phoebe** · 01-28-2016, 06:38 AM

Is it possible to add indices to REKO ?
For instance indices under 5 in REKO-F.
I presume, not very usefull. But is it absolutely useless or even dangerous ?

Second, I use -7 (REKO-F index) for 16 vs 10. Same question.

ScreenShot2.png

**Norm** · 01-28-2016, 06:47 AM

Of course. But, most of the useful indices are in the appendix.

**Phoebe** · 01-28-2016, 07:07 AM

I mean with indices rounded at +2 as in REKO instead of REKO-F

**Norm** · 01-28-2016, 07:15 AM

Yes. There are several threads in the archives on this. Here's one: https://www.blackjacktheforum.com/sh...=cacarulo+reko

**Phoebe** · 01-28-2016, 10:10 AM

Thanks.

Another question, in "Modern Blackjack" and CV*, for REKO-F, there are tables for :

Six-Deck S17
Six-Deck H17
Eight-Deck S17

but not Eight-Deck H17

Which to use ?

**Norm** · 01-28-2016, 10:26 AM

Afraid I haven't genned that. It was uncommon when I created the tables.

**Phoebe** · 01-28-2016, 12:28 PM

Which parmaters (penetration and RA) did you used ?
I can't replicate Eight-Deck S17 for "calibration"

**Norm** · 01-28-2016, 12:37 PM

RA is always set to 1.0. Penetration was fair. Doesn't matter much.

**Phoebe** · 01-28-2016, 01:10 PM

How could be "normal" differences between our sims if I use, for instance 6,5/8 penetrations ?

**Norm** · 01-28-2016, 01:16 PM

I would have used that or something close. You would expect indices that are very close, if not the same for an unbalanced strategy.

**Phoebe** · 01-28-2016, 01:44 PM

Can we say that +/-2 is close enough ?
And 9+9 vs 7 (no DAS) is 11 instead of 15

**Norm** · 01-28-2016, 02:38 PM

Unlikely to be that far off with an unbalanced strategy and enough accuracy requested.

**Phoebe** · 01-28-2016, 02:45 PM

What could do I wrong ?

Thread: REKO: more indices ?

Thread Tools

Display

REKO: more indices ?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

Other QFIT Sites

Internal Links

About Blackjack: The Forum