See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 13 of 62

Thread: Ohio Gamimg Law - Theory and Practice

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 06-14-2016, 03:01 PM #1
    RS
    RS is offline
    Senior Member RS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,988

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It's talking about cheating. I didn't see anything about the CASINO being allowed to or not allowed to 86 (unless the casino has gaming agents on staff?).
    "Everyone wants to be rich, but nobody wants to work for it." -Ryan Howard [The Office]
  2. 06-15-2016, 06:25 AM #2
    Bigdaddy
    Bigdaddy is offline
    Senior Member Bigdaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    940

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RollingStoned View Post
    It's talking about cheating. I didn't see anything about the CASINO being allowed to or not allowed to 86 (unless the casino has gaming agents on staff?).
    (I) A casino operator or management company shall have the same authority to eject or exclude a person from the management company's casino facilities as authorized in division (G) of this section. The licensee shall immediately notify the commission of an ejection or exclusion.

    I take this to mean that the Casino management has the same authority as the Commission to eject a person but again it would only be for the limited causes stated in Sections G1 - 3.
  3. 06-15-2016, 02:49 PM #3
    Boz
    Boz is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,122

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigdaddy View Post
    (I) A casino operator or management company shall have the same authority to eject or exclude a person from the management company's casino facilities as authorized in division (G) of this section. The licensee shall immediately notify the commission of an ejection or exclusion.

    I take this to mean that the Casino management has the same authority as the Commission to eject a person but again it would only be for the limited causes stated in Sections G1 - 3.
    Yes, they cannot be ejected for anything not listed, including murder.

    Instead of angrily clicking hate buttons, does someone want to explain why Missouri can't bar counters? I'm honestly asking, I'd like an explanation. Seemed like an appropriate thread to ask.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. The Theory of Blackjack
    By moses in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2013, 05:18 PM
  2. More Voodoo theory
    By Ikerus in forum The Disadvantage Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 01-26-2013, 10:25 AM
  3. Brick: BJ theory
    By Brick in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-19-2005, 03:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Other QFIT Sites

Internal Links

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.