6 & 8 shoe best system

[Torchia32]

Hey guys, new to forum but not new to counting. I haven't done much research since I decided to graduate from hi lo to Uston ss a few years back. I am having much success and not really looking to change to a new system just wanted to get your feedback on what you feel the best system is strictly for 6 and 8 shoe games. Are any of you using the Uston ss and recommend that? Or is there another system that you think can crush the ss(although I would be skeptical). Thanks guys

[seriousplayer]

Hey guys, new to forum but not new to counting. I haven't done much research since I decided to graduate from hi lo to Uston ss a few years back. I am having much success and not really looking to change to a new system just wanted to get your feedback on what you feel the best system is strictly for 6 and 8 shoe games. Are any of you using the Uston ss and recommend that? Or is there another system that you think can crush the ss(although I would be skeptical). Thanks guys

The Qfit Blackjack Strategy Advisor answers that question. However, it no longer works. We can submit a request to Norm for tech support.

[Torchia32]

The Qfit Blackjack Strategy Advisor answers that question. However, it no longer works. We can submit a request to Norm for tech support.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean?

[ZenMaster_Flash]

Hi-Opt II

[Torchia32]

The Qfit Blackjack Strategy Advisor answers that question. However, it no longer works. We can submit a request to Norm for tech support.

Hi-Opt II

Hey zen thanks for the feedback. Could you give me a little more info on why you prefer hi opt ll over ss for 6-8 shoes? The bc is .99 on ss and .91 on hi opt ll. I've found the lower bc systems have been less successful for me on larger shoes. Just want to hear your reasoning. Thanks again

[Norm]

The Qfit Blackjack Strategy Advisor answers that question. However, it no longer works. We can submit a request to Norm for tech support.

Should work now.

[ZenMaster_Flash]

".99 on ss and .91 on hi opt ll."

Hi-Opt II MUST be used with an Ace Side Count and that makes the B.C. .98

while the P.E. will be about .70, and the Insurance Correlation is near perfect.

Uston SS is simply NOT a good count.

[Torchia32]

The Qfit Blackjack Strategy Advisor answers that question. However, it no longer works. We can submit a request to Norm for tech support.

Hi-Opt II

Hi-Opt II MUST be used with an Ace Side Count and that makes the B.C. .98

while the P.E. will be about .70, and the Insurance Correlation is near perfect.

Uston SS is simply NOT a good count.

Thanks for that great insight. Which side count brings it to .98?

[ZenMaster_Flash]

"Which side count brings it to .98?"

READ what I just posted. I said ACE Side Count.

[Torchia32]

The Qfit Blackjack Strategy Advisor answers that question. However, it no longer works. We can submit a request to Norm for tech support.

Hi-Opt II

READ what I just posted. I said ACE Side Count.

Yes I did read that. I was asking which side count as in which ace side count? I didn't know there was only 1 way to do it as I have never tried using a side count for aces. Is there a link that shows how the ace side count works with the hi opt ll?

[Jabberwocky]

Just add +2 to the rc for each surplus ace in the remaining cards. Then do the reverse for every deficit ace.

[Torchia32]

The Qfit Blackjack Strategy Advisor answers that question. However, it no longer works. We can submit a request to Norm for tech support.

Hi-Opt II

Just add +2 to the rc for each surplus ace in the remaining cards. Then do the reverse for every deficit ace.

Thanks just doing that little trick changes bc from .91 to .98?

[NotEnoughHeat]

Thanks just doing that little trick changes bc from .91 to .98?

From what I understand, you use the count with the aces for betting and the use your count w/o aces for playing and insurance.

Pretty much all the important stuff is covered in Norm's free e-book Modern Blackjack