Tarzan: I've never felt invincible, even when winning big.
But once I almost started singing background music " Counting Stars" to my new words. That wouldn't hace sounded good. Lol.
Tarzan: I've never felt invincible, even when winning big.
But once I almost started singing background music " Counting Stars" to my new words. That wouldn't hace sounded good. Lol.
I.... feel so right doing the Wong thing!!! 9-5! 9-5! 9-5! Every king that screws her makes me feel alive!!
That's the right idea. Never overestimate the tiny sliver of advantage to be gained from counting. Years back I had some issues with being high on the hog, some personal overspending because of it and then running into a "drought" in the same timeframe causing me to panic, resize my bets and take months to build back up, all the while concerned about the precision of my play and critiquing what I was doing. I wasn't doing anything wrong to cause the string of losses, near perfect play as a matter of fact, it was just a matter of getting bad cards for an extended period. This is a scary prospect for a full time player who wants a ROR to be as near to zero as possible, to crash and burn is not an option. Thankfully, you are not in that situation and have a J-O-B, though!
Maybe if you considered ASC or anything that could tweak your game up though, whatever may be comfortable for you. I'm unfamiliar with what count you use or any of the particulars but Spanish21 is very beatable (just not by me is all as I haven't trained to play it). It's so completely different than regular blackjack and the first time you look at the basic strategy chart for it, you say to yourself, "Oh shit!" It's got its complexities, that's for sure. Bottom line is just evaluate your play, strategize... and it'd be great to hear the opposite of the original theme of this post down the road.
Last edited by Tarzan; 12-02-2015 at 01:40 AM.
Playing efficiency is the reason why an ace side count is theoretically useful. I get dealt way to many aces on max bet 11 doubles.
Won back another 1180 today. Only one good shoe but it was all that was needed.
I.... feel so right doing the Wong thing!!! 9-5! 9-5! 9-5! Every king that screws her makes me feel alive!!
"I believe my edge was slightly less than 1%"
It was probably more like 0.72% unless your spread was very aggressive.
That was a pretty poor game.
The difference between 60% and 67% is hardly
more than nil with a sample size of 300,
especially as you were playing "White Rabbit."
RESPECT the "Law of Large Numbers."
Sims can be beaten simply by varying the amount of time played. You can easily assess this, if you want, by playing for an exact predetermined time over several sessions vs adjusting your play time to try to achieve your desired result. Your higher percentage win rate will obviously occur when you adjust your play time to suit your desired result.
Bookmarks