Originally Posted by
CEO1
Sorry I meant + or - on Title (don't see how to edit Title)
Is it possible to run simulations on using different Betting strategies for when the deck is in a negative count vs those betting strategies used on a positive count. For example if you have a very mild progression in negative based on winning last hand say 1-2 or 1-3 vs a positive progression of 1-12 or something like that. Just find that when we are counting we try to show we are playing some type of progression system, and that all get lost with single bet after single bet when deck is negative.
Would a mild progression system in the negative allow you to get away with more on the positive. Pit/EITS would have even more confirmation you are just a basic strategy player using progression.
Or..would this all just be TOO costly. I am not concerned with the increase in variance here or risk of ruin effect, only potential help in cover.
Thanks
Bookmarks