My posts already addressed this, but I will challenge your challenge! The issue is, that either the 1% already figures in that you will withdraw from your bankroll in a certain way or it was never 1% in the first place! A standard RoR already takes into account what I referred to as the 'conditional RoR's' of possible future bankroll levels. The potential for your bankroll to grow, uninhibited, and reduce in RoR is part of the original (standard) RoR. Taking money out during wins and nothing out during losses is like a reverse loss rebate. We have already seen how powerful this concept is, just look at Don Johnson. What's the harm in the casino giving back some of it's winnings
?
For any other details of what I'm trying to get across, I refer you to my poor-accessibility wall-o-text
. Dang, I'm getting too hooked on smiley's, people are going to take me less seriously...
Bookmarks