http://www.pokertube.com/poker-news/...uthful-witness
"In fact, Genting’s lawyers were well aware of the fact that ‘cheaters’ card would probably not stand, so they came up with the phrase – ‘defeated purpose of the game’. One must wonder, what is the purpose of the game?"
Unfortunately, it appears as though the UK judiciary do not believe in AP techniques. If such a ruling were to be used as a precedent before a case involving card counting, STing etc. in a British casino, would a similar result ensue?
Bookmarks