Originally Posted by MannyOlaer
So this is why I've been getting my teeth kicked in!
Financial institutions hate SARs. Basically, they are making a subjective determination of the activity of one of their own customers. The only casino action that I can think of that might trigger an SAR would be along the lines of heavily betting red and black at the same time. Or, buying big chips at the table and then selling them back at the cage with little or no play.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
Ahh, look at section 35, item O in the SAR. "Misuse of Position or Self Dealing." They're looking for dealers that deal to themselves. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
SAR.jpg
(click to expand)
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
We have a player from Macau who was allowed to use a counting machine in Big Baccarat at Paris. He was a constant winner ranging from $40k to $60k everyday playing from 1 to 2 hours and quit. We can't figure out why he doesn't for emphasis play longer. I believe card counting in Baccarat is only good for short (win) play. Time is the casinos best ally to realize the full earning potential from the player. On second thought, It's stupid to count Bacc in the long run.
This is voodoo thinking. Either it works or it doesn't. And, it looks like I was right with my guess about "Paris."
Manny, you are wearing thin.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
Well, this is now deep in scam territory. Forget several obvious recent SPAMs, and numerous posts with voodoo thinking, this is the second post that sounds like it came straight out of the gambling scam world.
I am asking Manny to stop selling whatever it is he’s selling here until the membership makes clear how this should be handled.
Thread closed.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks