Preferential shuffling could be defined in two manners:
Shuffling when the advantage is in the player’s favor
Shuffling when the house thinks the advantage is in the player’s favor by actions of the player
In the first case, my non-lawyerly opinion is that the casino has violated the law, at least in Nevada.
The second case is more complex. I don’t see a letter-of-law violation in Nevada. But, there is a clear spirit-of-law violation in that the dealer is not supposed to have a strategy. The dealer is supposed to follow strict rules and is specifically not allowed to change the odds of the game.
Bookmarks