See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 22

Thread: 0% ror

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    South US
    Posts
    135


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    0% ror

    Does 0% ROR of a non-replenishable bankroll assuming perfect play actually mean I'll never bust? For example of $10,000 bankroll, CVCX shows there's a chance to be down 9100 the worst. Say I kept playing at 9100 down, it would be impossible to bust at that point continuing perfect play?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    In rounding numbers, if the field allows for 1 decimal digit 0% means less than .05%. If it is 2 decimal digits 0% means less than 0.005%. If you resize your bets with your fluctuating BR your bets will be less than 10% of the initial bets at $900 left of a $10K BR. Your risk is still the same but your EV has tanked.
    Last edited by Three; 05-08-2014 at 04:25 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Risk of ruin assumes no resizing at that given bankroll at that specific moment in time. Once you play your first session and have a result your risk of ruin changes because you now have new information. Lose $9,100 of a $10,000 bankroll and you're risk of ruin is based on having a $900 bankroll, not a $10,000 bankroll.
    Last edited by bigplayer; 05-07-2014 at 10:01 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Bodarc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    136 miles North of West
    Posts
    1,949


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Impossible has a probability of zero but a zero probability does not mean it is impossible. Probability of .000000000000000001 would be considered a probability of 0 but it is still possible to go broke.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    South US
    Posts
    135


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    So I should resize bets after every loss, win or both? Say I had 12,000, a 2000 overall gain with still 0% ROR, would be my best interest to increase the bet spread?

  6. #6


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by code red View Post
    So I should resize bets after every loss, win or both? Say I had 12,000, a 2000 overall gain with still 0% ROR, would be my best interest to increase the bet spread?

    Yes. You should be betting a percentage of Kelly.
    "Everyone wants to be rich, but nobody wants to work for it." -Ryan Howard [The Office]

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    South US
    Posts
    135


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RollingStoned View Post
    Yes. You should be betting a percentage of Kelly.
    Aight. I will stick with half a kelly.

    As always thanks to all who replied.

  8. #8
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,504


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bigplayer View Post
    Risk of ruin assumes no resizing at that given bankroll at that specific moment in time. Once you play your first session and have a result your risk of ruin changes because you now have new information. Lose $9,100 of a $10,000 bankroll and you're risk of ruin is based on having a $900 bankroll, not a $10,000 bankroll.
    So there is never a way to know your long term ROR? It's kind of misleading then. The way I saw it was that if I had a 10, 000 bankroll and played perfectly and had a 1% ROR that as long as I played the way I had it simmed and no errors that I would have a 99% chance of not going bust.

    What is the point of having ROR calculated then in CVCX if it is always changing, kind of pointless to be honest
    Last edited by ZenKinG; 05-08-2014 at 08:50 AM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenKinG View Post
    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Originally Posted by bigplayer
    "Risk of ruin assumes no resizing at that given bankroll at that specific moment in time. Once you play your first session and have a result your risk of ruin changes because you now have new information. Lose $9,100 of a $10,000 bankroll and you're risk of ruin is based on having a $900 bankroll, not a $10,000 bankroll."

    So there is never a way to know your long term ROR? It's kind of misleading then. The way I saw it was that if I had a 10, 000 bankroll and played perfectly and had a 1% ROR that as long as I played the way I had it simmed and no errors that I would have a 99% chance of not going bust.
    These 2 statements aren't mutually exclusive. You had a set RoR when you started, as you say 1%. You can calculate your current RoR given your new BR at any time. That 1% that goes bust from the beginning has to go through your current BR to go bust if your BR has shrunk. Your new RoR tells you the chances that you are in that 1% that would go bust from those starting with your initial BR and other parameters input into the sim.
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenKinG View Post
    What is the point of having ROR calculated then in CVCX if it is always changing, kind of pointless to be honest
    The point of calculating RoR is to properly manage your BR as you go forward. Your point shows the importance of recalculating RoR after large losses to determine at what point you need to take what most see as extreme step, drawdown (resizing down your bets to protect your BR at the expense of EV). It will make regaining your losses take longer if your approach is unchanged except for your bet sizes. It will also mean you are less likely to go bust than you were before the drawdown which allows you a better chance to recover in the long run and avoid your probable fate as being part of that 1%.
    Last edited by Three; 05-08-2014 at 09:10 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenKinG View Post
    What is the point of having ROR calculated then in CVCX if it is always changing
    CVCX is like a snapshot given the facts at that moment. You cannot assume that you still are playing to a $10,000 bankroll once you've lost half of it. That is illogical. You purchase CVCX so that you can frequently re-run your risk of ruin figures as your bankroll goes up and down. Most teams/players plan ahead before they start playing for draw downs by knowing at what point they will tell everyone to resize or ask investors for more capital (a margin call). For our group we would resize when we lost 1/3 of the bank and then size back up only after we'd recovered 1/2 of the loss, we'd resize again after we lost 1/2 of the original bank and not resize back up until we'd recovered 1/2 of the loss and then only resize to 3/4 stakes.
    Last edited by bigplayer; 05-08-2014 at 12:26 PM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    South US
    Posts
    135


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bigplayer View Post
    You purchase CVCX so that you can frequently re-run your risk of ruin figures as your bankroll goes up and down
    Glad I asked because yesterday I thought it was just for selecting a bankroll and playing it all with those bet sizes until nothings left, then adding to the bankroll and continuing with the spread.

    I realize now these are totally independent of each other, in case I lost 9100 of a 10000 bankroll that doesn't mean I'm going to turn it around. I'd resize bets and continue.
    Last edited by code red; 05-08-2014 at 03:35 PM.

  12. #12


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenKinG View Post
    So there is never a way to know your long term ROR? It's kind of misleading then. The way I saw it was that if I had a 10, 000 bankroll and played perfectly and had a 1% ROR that as long as I played the way I had it simmed and no errors that I would have a 99% chance of not going bust.

    What is the point of having ROR calculated then in CVCX if it is always changing, kind of pointless to be honest
    It's like saying the chance of flipping a coin 5 times heads in a row is 1/32 (ie: ROR=1%). After the first flip (being heads), you now have a 1/16 chance to get 5 heads in a row (ie: ROR != 1%). After a total of 4 flips all being heads, you now have a 1/2 chance of flipping 5 heads. Earlier you calculated the chance of 5 heads to be 1/32. In the same way, earlier (with a $10k roll) you calculated a 1% ROR. But now, you have a 1/2 chance of flipping 5 heads in a row (since the first 4 have been heads), and your ROR is no longer 1%, more like 80%+ on your $1k roll.
    "Everyone wants to be rich, but nobody wants to work for it." -Ryan Howard [The Office]

  13. #13
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,504


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RollingStoned View Post
    It's like saying the chance of flipping a coin 5 times heads in a row is 1/32 (ie: ROR=1%). After the first flip (being heads), you now have a 1/16 chance to get 5 heads in a row (ie: ROR != 1%). After a total of 4 flips all being heads, you now have a 1/2 chance of flipping 5 heads. Earlier you calculated the chance of 5 heads to be 1/32. In the same way, earlier (with a $10k roll) you calculated a 1% ROR. But now, you have a 1/2 chance of flipping 5 heads in a row (since the first 4 have been heads), and your ROR is no longer 1%, more like 80%+ on your $1k roll.
    I understand that but my point is that it is useless information to someone playing long term and isn't AP blackjack, for example counting going to be a long ter m game, so that's where I got disappointed.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.