Most definately. I agree that a complex system is extremely difficult, almost impossible in a multi-deck/player game. My hat is off to Tarzan that can actually do it. He's got to be a genius. However, us "mental midgets" lol can profit very nicely in singledeck 1 on 1 with a sound strategy and gameplan.
I'm definitely NOT "ahead" of Tthree and moreover I'm not even "pro full time" -- tried it a few years ago and long since decided the travelling lifestyle is not for me, hence cannot be a full time AP pro since travel is absolutely required for the lone wolf to have any chance at all.
On the contrary, what I'm working on with our team website is local-focused and part time emphasis for MOST (or even maybe ALL) team members... because that's gonna solve the problem I have, personally... which is namely being a long-time AP who is possibly reaching the end of the line for local play tolerance, but who is unwilling to travel, but also unwilling to give up on the game, or give up on taking money out of the casinos, LOL.
-DBJT
Using what I like to call 'supervariables', you can choose any indicator you want, give it whatever weight you want, and you can have an 0-10 team as national champion. The real BCS was not that bad, but I have seen marketing literature for the academic programs in bottom rung schools that have them ranked like 7th in the nation, just barely losing out to places like Harvard and Columbia. They do not use things like graduation rates and income projections. They do use things like square footage of the second floor of the library.
Bookmarks