See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 21

Thread: Rider strategy

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Rider strategy

    hi,

    Can CVCX/CVData simulate the Optional Bet Split Rule ?

    Rider.jpg
    James
    Last edited by James989; 09-06-2013 at 10:09 PM.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Maybe...

    James,

    CVData does have the capability to handle the "discard split" rule, which is equivalent to playing a "rider" strategy where the ratio of (Big Bet)/(Small Bet) approaches infinity. For example, if the front bettor is betting $10 and the back bettor is betting $1000, then the ratio is 100, which is pretty close to infinity for this calculation.

    On the other hand, if the ratio is small, like 5, then the "discard split" rule would not adequately represent the actual situation.

    Are you looking just for B.S. results? If so, and if you have Green Chip access to bj21.com, you can see a post I made on this topic at this URL:
    http://www.bj21.com/greenchip/theory...-hairy-splits/.

    That post not only contains B.S. tables, it also describes the methodolgy used to derive them, in case your situation differs from those covered.

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I am not greenchip member, Can you send me your post ?

    Yes, I am looking just for B.S results. As for CVDATA, I "check" the Discard Split option in CVDATA, then how to modify the split srtategy ?
    Could you show me step by step? I am still new to CVDATA.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Are you using this to play csms james?

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    yes

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Are you playing with a partner?
    hows that working out for you?

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bjarg View Post
    Are you playing with a partner?
    hows that working out for you?
    just want to lower the house edge. How to use CVDATA to simulate it ?

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Hand View Post
    James,

    CVData does have the capability to handle the "discard split" rule, which is equivalent to playing a "rider" strategy where the ratio of (Big Bet)/(Small Bet) approaches infinity. For example, if the front bettor is betting $10 and the back bettor is betting $1000, then the ratio is 100, which is pretty close to infinity for this calculation.

    On the other hand, if the ratio is small, like 5, then the "discard split" rule would not adequately represent the actual situation.

    Are you looking just for B.S. results? If so, and if you have Green Chip access to bj21.com, you can see a post I made on this topic at this URL:
    http://www.bj21.com/greenchip/theory...-hairy-splits/.

    That post not only contains B.S. tables, it also describes the methodolgy used to derive them, in case your situation differs from those covered.

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand
    Just reply your PM. Still new to CVDATA, need your explanation.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Dog Hand,

    here are the BS for ES10 :-

    Table1.jpgTable2.jpg

    James

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    James,

    What's missing are the EV's for the various split hands. For example, you show that 66 vs. 8 is a Hit (because Hit is the highest-EV play). But that doesn't tell us how MUCH better Hitting is than Splitting. For example, if the Hit EV is -0.279301 and the Split EV is -0.416429, then you'd want to use a Defensive split (so the big bettor would NOT put out additional money) as long as the Ratio of (Big Bet)/(Small Bet) is 1.92 or larger. But we cannot calculate these Ratios without knowing the EV's for the best play and for splitting for each potential split hand.

    By the way, the Critical Ratio (about 1.92, in this case) is calculated by this equation:

    Critical Ratio = (2-(2*(Best EV)/(Split EV)))/((2*(Best EV)/(Split EV))-1).

    If you can supply these EV's, I can calculate the Rider strategy and how much it's worth.

    Dog Hand

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Hi Dog Hand,

    I think you can use MGP's BJ Analyzer to compute best EV and split EV.

    http://www.blackjackinfo.com/MGP_BJCA_Setup.zip.

    After installation, launch MGP's BJ CA, input all the BJ rules(see image1) and hit "calculate now"(near top of the page), after few seconds, a new window " MGP's BJ CA Results Analysis" will appear, then you can see the HE(-0.168% for my case), then click "strategies"(near top of page), click "CD soft/pairs". On the right hand side, click cell for 6,6 vs 8 in "Pair CD strategy", then it will show all EV's for split, hit, stand, double(see image2).....You can get the EV's for other hands, 2,2 vs 7, 3,3 vs 8 . .. by just click the relevant cells.


    image1.jpg
    image2.jpg



    Let me know


    James

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Rider Strategy for 6D, S17, DAS, ES10, NHC (BB+1), 25:1 ratio of Big:Small wagers

    James989,

    I finally finished typing in all the numbers from MGP's software... I was kind of hoping you'd do that for me, since the results are for you!

    At any rate, for your 6D, S17, DAS, ES10, NHC (BB+1) rider game with the ratio of the big bet to the small bet of 25:1, I found that, with optimal strategy, your "team" does have +EV... though not very much: you'll make 0.00511 units per round, where the "unit" is the small bettor's initial wager. Thus, every 200 rounds you'll earn about 1 small wager... but at least it's +EV!

    The big bettor's strategy yields an IBA of +0.040%, while the small bettor's "crazy splitting" strategy has an IBA of -0.489%. (Using pure B.S., by the way, gives an IBA of -0.163% with the strategy generated by MGP's software.) Thus, you can see that the small bettor is giving up quite a bit of EV to make the big bettor's EV positive.

    Here is the tabular output of the splitting strategy. "D" is the dealer's upcard, "Pair" is your pair, "DAS BS EV" is the EV for the best play for normal B.S. (for a DAS game), "DAS BS" is the normal B.S. move, "DAS Crit. R" is the critical ratio of (big bet)/(small bet) (so if your ratio is less than the Critical R, you would NOT alter the B.S.... note though that all of the R values are less than 8, so you'll make ALL the moves), "New BS" is the new B.S. move, where "PU" means "sPlit Unequal" (the defensive splits that the big bettor will NOT follow) and "PE" means "sPlit Equal" (the offensive splits that the big bettor WILL make). Of course, if the "New BS" column says H, S, or D, you'll make the indicated move.

    The last column shows that, for a Ratio of 25, this rider strategy will increase the big bettor's BS EV by 0.1720% overall, then for each unequal split it shows the gain to the big bettor (in "big bet" units): thus, if the small bettor splits 8,8 vs. A rather than hits, the big bettor gains just over 0.3 "big bet units", or about 7.5 small bet units for a 25:1 ratio.

    Note that now, you will NOT surrender 7,7 vs. X or 8,8 vs. X, since the "team" EV is higher with PU than ES for these plays.

    Code:
    D Pair DAS DAS DAS New Ratio=25
    BS EV BS Crit. R BS 0.1720%
    A A,A -0.223037 P 0.00 PU 0.107229
    A 2,2 -0.486005 H 4.15 PU>4.15 0.063312
    A 3,3 -0.523789 H 3.45 PU>3.44 0.079668
    A 4,4 -0.447678 H -29.54 H 0.000000
    A 5,5 -0.253552 H -3.00 H 0.000000
    A 6,6 -0.556420 H 7.94 PU>7.93 0.036745
    A 7,7 -0.619978 H 1.76 PU>1.75 0.147526
    A 8,8 -0.664681 H 0.09 PU>0.09 0.304365
    A 9,9 -0.374835 S 1.69 PU>1.69 0.090997
    A 10,10 0.151246 S -1.70 S 0.000000
    2 A,A 0.485870 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    2 2,2 -0.077656 P 0.00 PU 0.037335
    2 3,3 -0.133281 P 0.00 PU 0.064078
    2 4,4 -0.019850 H -2.27 H 0.000000
    2 5,5 0.373180 D -1.27 D 0.000000
    2 6,6 -0.196852 P 0.00 PU 0.094640
    2 7,7 -0.119776 P 0.00 PU 0.057585
    2 8,8 0.081885 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    2 9,9 0.197956 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    2 10,10 0.637885 S -0.90 S 0.000000
    3 A,A 0.533182 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    3 2,2 -0.005991 P 0.00 PU 0.002880
    3 3,3 -0.049280 P 0.00 PU 0.023692
    3 4,4 0.011580 H -1.80 H 0.000000
    3 5,5 0.425665 D -1.18 D 0.000000
    3 6,6 -0.098839 P 0.00 PU 0.047519
    3 7,7 -0.028215 P 0.00 PU 0.013565
    3 8,8 0.154534 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    3 9,9 0.252570 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    3 10,10 0.647984 S -0.82 S 0.000000
    4 A,A 0.582709 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    4 2,2 0.069425 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    4 3,3 0.049555 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    4 4,4 0.048027 H -0.96 H 0.000000
    4 5,5 0.481119 D -1.09 D 0.000000
    4 6,6 0.004609 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    4 7,7 0.072122 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    4 8,8 0.223481 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    4 9,9 0.320554 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    4 10,10 0.658450 S -0.73 S 0.000000
    5 A,A 0.633923 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 2,2 0.174105 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 3,3 0.154027 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 4,4 0.111389 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 5,5 0.540491 D -0.99 D 0.000000
    5 6,6 0.112394 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 7,7 0.160364 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 8,8 0.303844 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 9,9 0.393899 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    5 10,10 0.670892 S -0.62 S 0.000000
    6 A,A 0.682366 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 2,2 0.240164 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 3,3 0.216345 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 4,4 0.167593 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 5,5 0.598853 D -0.95 D 0.000000
    6 6,6 0.158403 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 7,7 0.248859 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 8,8 0.405689 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 9,9 0.463967 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    6 10,10 0.702826 S -0.53 S 0.000000
    7 A,A 0.475600 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    7 2,2 0.008509 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    7 3,3 -0.051174 P 0.00 PU 0.024603
    7 4,4 0.086616 H -1.49 H 0.000000
    7 5,5 0.404746 D -1.27 D 0.000000
    7 6,6 -0.220562 H 0.34 PU>0.34 0.089339
    7 7,7 -0.048469 P 0.00 PU 0.023302
    7 8,8 0.318719 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    7 9,9 0.399576 S -0.16 S 0.000000
    7 10,10 0.772011 S -0.77 S 0.000000
    8 A,A 0.359708 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    8 2,2 -0.156790 H 0.29 PU>0.29 0.065024
    8 3,3 -0.219182 H 0.11 PU>0.10 0.099456
    8 4,4 -0.059090 H -2.57 H 0.000000
    8 5,5 0.293033 D -1.44 D 0.000000
    8 6,6 -0.279301 H 1.92 PU>1.91 0.063265
    8 7,7 -0.377709 H 0.07 PU>0.07 0.174941
    8 8,8 -0.029064 P 0.00 PU 0.013973
    8 9,9 0.229801 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    8 10,10 0.790420 S -0.96 S 0.000000
    9 A,A 0.237754 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    9 2,2 -0.237873 H 3.19 PU>3.19 0.038406
    9 3,3 -0.295264 H 1.71 PU>1.70 0.071369
    9 4,4 -0.209848 H -6.76 H 0.000000
    9 5,5 0.149188 D -1.68 D 0.000000
    9 6,6 -0.347155 H 5.48 PU>5.48 0.034841
    9 7,7 -0.437912 H 0.89 PU>0.89 0.140439
    9 8,8 -0.389371 P 0.00 PU 0.187198
    9 9,9 -0.081416 P 0.00 PU 0.039142
    9 10,10 0.756075 S -1.12 S 0.000000
    10 A,A 0.097833 P 0.00 PE 0.000000
    10 2,2 -0.342582 H 4.44 PU>4.44 0.042027
    10 3,3 -0.390229 H 3.02 PU>3.02 0.065662
    10 4,4 -0.306402 H -9.39 H 0.000000
    10 5,5 -0.052625 H -2.15 H 0.000000
    10 6,6 -0.430369 H 7.00 PU>6.99 0.033118
    10 7,7 -0.500000 R 1.37 PU>1.37 0.134717
    10 8,8 -0.500000 R 0.19 PU>0.18 0.218114
    10 9,9 -0.235462 S 3.75 PU>3.75 0.033446
    10 10,10 0.438046 S -1.34 S 0.000000
    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand

  13. #13


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Dog Hand,

    Thanks for your amazing analysis ! Please check your PM.

    I am using CVDATA and apply your split strategy for small and big bettor (see images below)and the IBA EV(big bettor) = +0.019% and IBA EV(small bettor) = -0.515%.

    SPLIT-SB.jpgSPLIT-BB.jpg

    How you obtained positive edge EV = +0.040% for big bettor ? You assumed OBO(American) rules or BB + 1 rules ?


    James
    Last edited by James989; 09-19-2013 at 07:15 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Greasy John: Rider bets
    By Greasy John in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-13-2004, 04:41 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-24-2002, 01:54 PM
  3. Rivaldo: BS and indices for a rider
    By Rivaldo in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-03-2002, 02:51 AM
  4. CoVa: BJ in Vegas - rider bets
    By CoVa in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-21-2002, 05:50 PM
  5. Pete: Caller and Rider??
    By Pete in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-04-2001, 06:22 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.