See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 65

Thread: Stanford Wong & Craps

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Stanford Wong & Craps

    We all respect Stanford Wong for his knowledge and practical application of blackjack theory. He also is a proponent of dice control. How does this affect your opinion of the work he has done on BJ and do you subscribe to the hypothesis that craps can be beaten with physical skill?
    All bleeding stops eventually.

  2. #2
    Junior Member Suwon Fish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Land of the Morning Calm
    Posts
    24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Kudos to Stanford Wong, but I think controlled throwing of dice is pure voodoo. That said, palming and manipulating gaffed dice is a simple parlour trick (though not at a casino).

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Suwon Fish View Post
    Kudos to Stanford Wong, but I think controlled throwing of dice is pure voodoo. That said, palming and manipulating gaffed dice is a simple parlour trick (though not at a casino).
    Why would you think that?

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Ya know, I listened to his interview on GWAE. I started out a skeptic, but ended up less so. I thought Wong approached the subject in a practical way. He admitted that the technique was difficult, required a lot of practice, depended on playing conditions, and was aided by athletic ability (which I took to mean dexterity). He also admitted that he no longer had the ability since he no longer put in the requisite practice.
    Last edited by victorino; 12-27-2011 at 08:03 AM. Reason: clarification

  5. #5


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Here is Bryce Carlson's take. (Author of Blackjack For Blood) I think his argument is persuasive.

    http://www.richardmunchkin.com/2011/...ntrol-not.html

  6. #6
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thank you for the link to one of the most insite filled physics articles I've read regarding craps in quite some time.
    All bleeding stops eventually.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by FlightMedicNoMore View Post
    Thank you for the link to one of the most insite filled physics articles I've read regarding craps in quite some time.
    What did Bryce say at the end of the article? This doesn't prove it can't be beaten but proves it is
    unbeatable. what is that!?

  8. #8
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,492
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by gamblingghost View Post
    What did Bryce say at the end of the article? This doesn't prove it can't be beaten but proves it is
    unbeatable. what is that!?
    It's the difference between "shadow of a doubt" and "reasonable doubt."
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RWM View Post
    Here is Bryce Carlson's take. (Author of Blackjack For Blood) I think his argument is persuasive.
    http://www.richardmunchkin.com/2011/...ntrol-not.html
    That was pursuasive. And...I'm more skeptical again. And to answer the OP, no, Wong's work on craps does not diminish in my mind his tremendous contributions to blackjack.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    east
    Posts
    456


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by victorino View Post
    That was pursuasive. And...I'm more skeptical again. And to answer the OP, no, Wong's work on craps does not diminish in my mind his tremendous contributions to blackjack.
    Thank you Victorino. The article poster by Richard Munchkin quoting Bryce Carlson has some solid information and the 5 year study might be the best there has ever been about the subject. There is still a strong market for the believers of the impossible. Players will be setting the die before throwing them just as they always have. The profitable rolls will be fun and surely because of their rolls. Tosses for losses will be variance. I still like SW and his BJ contributions also.

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    RWM, glad you posted that. I was looking for it so I could do the same.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bethesda, MD / Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    2,808


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by FlightMedicNoMore View Post
    We all respect Stanford Wong for his knowledge and practical application of blackjack theory. He also is a proponent of dice control. How does this affect your opinion of the work he has done on BJ and do you subscribe to the hypothesis that craps can be beaten with physical skill?
    As far as I'm concerned, the two bodies of work are completely separate. Wong himself had doubts as to dice control, and he never collected enough data on himself to be proof of the ability. I have two takes on Dice control. One, if you got good enough to do it (assuming it's even possible) in the manner described in Wong's book, you would look so good as you lofted the dice in a flat projectory, rotating them on a single axis in unison, and hitting the crease between the pyramids and the table floor in every case, with just enough backspin to prevent the dice from tumbling too much, that a streak of wins would probably get you backed off is short order. To do it as he described would just look too good, too convincing, along with actual success.

    The second thing, I believe that in days past it was quite possible to exercise dice control, but those were the days when casinos were not all that upset with the dice sliding across the table felt. When Archie Karas had his fabulous "Run" of millions of dollars at Binion's, it is thought that he employed such a technique. One night, as the story goes, Binion had an extremely bouncy material placed under the felt to make it more difficult to slide the dice. Some say that is how Binion finally got his money back. Myth or fact, I don't know. But nowadays, they don't let the dice slide all that much. If you start winning doing so, you can be sure they will call, "No dice! You must hit the backstop in the air, sir!"

    Aslan 11/1/90 - 6/15/10 Stormy 1/22/95 - 8/23/10... “Life’s most urgent question is: what are you doing for others?” — Martin Luther King, Jr.

  13. #13
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,492
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Inertia

    When you throw dice, they have a nice spin that keeps them on track.

    When you are gliding down the highway at 60 on a motorcycle, you have two large gyroscopes that keep you upright. Take your hands off the handlebars, and hit one of them with the palm of your hand. The front wheel will turn a bit, the bike lean in the other direction, then it will snap back upright – back on course. The inertia is too great to upset the bike’s course. Lock the rear wheel, and you’ll drop and slide. But, hit a big rock with the front wheel and it’s another story. One of the gyroscopes is yanked hard. Now you have forces pushing the bike in random directions. You will be tumbling and/or sliding before you know what happened; and pieces of the bike will fly in different directions as it flops uncontrollably.

    This is how I picture dice hitting the back wall. I don’t like betting on the ending position of either when the energy has dissipated.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.