FLASH: queries re: questionable indices

[Don Schlesinger]

> Re-running the indices in question has really gotten
> my attention:

> The most obvious error re: 8-8 is bizarre as it is
> clear that the index is a "+" number not a
> negative one.

> A-7 vs. Ace cannot be +17. That is just plain silly.

That's not what you wrote the first time. Clearly, you're doing something wrong. Afraid I can't help you.

> 2D S17 No DAS:

> 88 vs 10 = -15

Makes no sense.

> A7 vs A = 0

That seems correct.

> A7 vs 2 = +4
> A4 vs 5 = -6

These are Hi-Opt II indices, so I can't pass judgment on all of them.

> 2D H17 DAS:

> 88 vs 10 = always split

Clearly silly.

> A7 vs A = +17

You're doing something wrong. Why not write to Karel: [email protected]

Don

[FLASH]

Thanx Don. I shall do so.

[FLASH]

You wrote above:

"That's not what you wrote the first time. Afraid I can't help you"

Don, the first line states that I have RE-RUN S B A

[Don Schlesinger]

> You wrote above:

> "That's not what you wrote the first time. Afraid
> I can't help you"

> Don, the first line states that I have RE-RUN S B A

Yes, I realize that. My point is that the first number for that play made sense. Then, you reran it, and it made no snese at all; so my conclusion is that you must have done something wrong.

Don