-
Zenfighter: Re: Short comments
I liked what I?ve seen so far with this sample-sheet. The amount of work to be done before reaching a quality one, looks huge. I?m sure you suspect that, too. Who is in a hurry, here? Best of luck with your spreadsheets!
Btw, I think, the appropriate 11th column for 6 decks [m (6)] and for all tables could be extracted and published as a short appendix. I really hate the interpolation by reciprocals method, to obtain this figure. Supposedly, we?re striving for extreme accuracy here. It is in my working-agenda, granted.
The sheets will have the option to manipulate spreads, right?
Sincerely
Zenfighter
-
bjmagic: Re: Short comments
> I liked what I?ve seen so far with this
> sample-sheet. The amount of work to be done
> before reaching a quality one, looks huge.
> I?m sure you suspect that, too. Who is in a
> hurry, here? Best of luck with your
> spreadsheets!
I already have the sheets done for all of the dealer cards including Soft 17 for 6 and A. I have only done a limited set of plays (ie Hard 16 to 12 and Doubling on 11 to 8 and some soft doubles from Griffin). As far as I am concerned it is currently in a somewhat useable form (for me at least).
> The sheets will have the option to
> manipulate spreads, right?
Currently I have all the gains from perfect play linked into a final summary sheet that can then be adjusted by inputting units bet for each play. This is the process that will take the longest for someone to use. I am trying to think of a way to automate this process. Any thoughts??? I am thinking of using Snyder's algebraic approximations of optimum basic strategy as a starting point and then using those index numbers to come up with units bet.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks