Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: WaToiler: BJA3 basic strategy question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    WaToiler
    Guest

    WaToiler: BJA3 basic strategy question

    In BJA3, the basic strategy chart for 1-deck H17 NDAS shows that for 12 vs. 3, we should stand if the 12 is a "multi-card, original hand only." Therefore, if the 12 comes after a pair split, we should hit.

    Am I correct on this? It is just not intuitive to me because if the 12 comes after a split, the count will most likely be higher, making it more advantageous to stand.

    Is there an explanation for this counter-intuitive phenomenon?

  2. #2
    Don Schlesinger
    Guest

    Don Schlesinger: Re: BJA3 basic strategy question

    > In BJA3, the basic strategy chart for 1-deck H17 NDAS
    > shows that for 12 vs. 3, we should stand if the 12 is
    > a "multi-card, original hand only."
    > Therefore, if the 12 comes after a pair split, we
    > should hit.

    > Am I correct on this? It is just not intuitive to me
    > because if the 12 comes after a split, the count will
    > most likely be higher, making it more advantageous to
    > stand.

    > Is there an explanation for this counter-intuitive
    > phenomenon?

    Yes, and it lies in the very definition that Cacarulo and I adopted for Basic Strategy. In particular, take a minute or two to reread the Intro to Appendix A, beginning on p. 387, and then the end of the Intro to Appendix B, pp. 476-77.

    In short, once you've split a pair, we revert back to T-D strategy, always, in effect, not permitting the basic strategist to take into account the extra cards lying on the table by virtue of the split.

    Don

  3. #3
    MGP
    Guest

    MGP: Re: BJA3 basic strategy question

    > In BJA3, the basic strategy chart for 1-deck H17 NDAS
    > shows that for 12 vs. 3, we should stand if the 12 is
    > a "multi-card, original hand only."
    > Therefore, if the 12 comes after a pair split, we
    > should hit.

    > Am I correct on this? It is just not intuitive to me
    > because if the 12 comes after a split, the count will
    > most likely be higher, making it more advantageous to
    > stand.

    > Is there an explanation for this counter-intuitive
    > phenomenon?

    It's because as Don said that's how they defined it. You get a better EV by using the same strategy for 2 card hands and 3-or-more card hands respectively pre- and post-split. I.e. if the strategy is to stand on a 2 card pre-split hand but hit the 3-card one - you should do the same post-split.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.