panda: early positive count

[panda]

I have found that a TC of 2 or higher early (2 decks)in a 6D shoe is not as good as later in a shoe (4 decks in. In other words I'll get my 19 - 21 on a higher positive count 4 or more decks in then I will early in a shoe... Why is that?.... Please help & thanks
Panda

[Don Schlesinger]

> I have found that a TC of 2 or higher early (2
> decks)in a 6D shoe is not as good as later in a shoe
> (4 decks in. In other words I'll get my 19 - 21 on a
> higher positive count 4 or more decks in than I will
> early in a shoe... Why is that?.... Please help &
> thanks

First, you need to understand something: What happens to you personally means virtually nothing. You can't found a theory of blackjack by describing your personal observances.

That said, the same true count is worth more the deeper into the pack one goes. The phenomenon is described by me in the greatest detail in the chapter 6 study of BJA3 called "The Floating Advantage." I assume you haven't read it.

Don