CORRELATIONS FOR 6 DECKS AND S17
Hand TKO UBZ II Uston SS
Insurance 0.7832 0.8448 0.7288
16 vs. T 0.5715 0.6204 0.6333
16 vs. 9 0.3811 0.4909 0.5139
15 vs. T 0.7818 0.8673 0.8275
13 vs. 3 0.7575 0.7993 0.7683
13 vs. 2 0.7406 0.7782 0.7374
12 vs. 6 0.6795 0.7599 0.6280
12 vs. 5 0.8305 0.8803 0.7758
12 vs. 4 0.8168 0.8742 0.7481
12 vs. 3 0.7608 0.8136 0.6930
12 vs. 2 0.6970 0.7401 0.6146
11 vs. A 0.8429 0.9125 0.8474
10 vs. A 0.9746 0.9773 0.9491
10 vs. T 0.9203 0.8436 0.8693
9 vs. 2 0.8709 0.8662 0.8131
9 vs. 7 0.8420 0.8510 0.8998
8 vs. 6 0.8177 0.8692 0.8746
8 vs. 5 0.8836 0.9428 0.9418
A8 vs. 6 0.8083 0.9064 0.8496
A8 vs. 5 0.8482 0.9310 0.8781
THE FABULOUS FOUR
15 vs. 9 0.7248 0.8237 0.8272
15 vs. T 0.7375 0.8306 0.8251
15 vs. A 0.5813 0.6837 0.7083
14 vs. T 0.7975 0.7902 0.7590
Systems tags and efficiencies
TKO = -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 ?1 PE = .5528
UBZ II = -1 1 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 ?2 PE = .6160
Uston SS = -2 2 2 2 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 PE = .5548
The Uston SS player is a sort of Halves? one. That is, a monster betting correlation, but as a consequence, the efficiency sinks.
The UBZ II outperforms slightly his ?father? in betting correlation, but on the other hand the playing efficiency drops slightly, too.
TKO is clearly better than Hi-lo. The numbers speak for themselves.
At the risk of repeating myself:
Enjoy your own count!
Sincerely,
Zf
P.S. My special thanks to Cac and Brett Harris. Seems like I?ve learned a couple of good things from these two BJ experts, lately!
Bookmarks