Praying Mantis: UBZ II or TKO?

[Zenfighter]

I think we have to wait for Norm for a double check.

Meanwhile somehow surprised by Zen beating Halves in shoe games (provided a 1 to 12/16 spread) and after reading you calmly I?ve extracted the following based exclusively in Richard Reid?s OSR formula who evaluate potential gains based exclusively in linear estimates of Betting correlations, Playing efficiency and Insurance correlations. Here are my results:

 

Overall System Ratings Comparison 

 

Count			1-12		1-16 

 

Halves			97.99		98.18 

 

Zen			96.65		96.58 

 

The higher IC of the Zen count doesn?t act with enough power to fight the monster BC of Halves.

Pure math, I know, no cut card placement, so pure linear estimates in gain. Moral? Let?s wait for confirmation.

Hope this helps, anyway.

Zenfighter

[Don Schlesinger]

I thought I provided the CVCX comparsion above, for I18. Adding four more indices can't possibly make any major difference to completely reverse the magnitude of the SCOREs.

There simply is no logic that I can think of behind Zen's outperforming Halves.

Don

[davinci]

> I thought I provided the CVCX comparsion
> above, for I18. Adding four more indices
> can't possibly make any major difference to
> completely reverse the magnitude of the
> SCOREs.

> There simply is no logic that I can think of
> behind Zen's outperforming Halves.

> Don
Back at original question. I changed about 6 mos. ago from KO to UBZ2. I found the level 2 counting easier than true, and I had little trouble adjusting to new values.