P.S.

I guess in practice you would round up 2.7, 2.8, and 2.9 to 3. So practically there is no difference.

Cheers,
Boardwalker

> The following quote is from Wongs 1981
> Professional Blackjack; "More
> precisely, when using high-low adjusted for
> aces, insurance is profitable above +3 for
> one deck, +2.9 for two decks, +2.8 for four
> decks,and 2.7 for six decks". Don, this
> seems to contradict your advise to always
> use +3.

> Cheers,
> Boardwalker