In the SCORE chapter in BJ attack, it talks of back-counting a six-deck shoe, entering at a higher count, flat betting with an increased unit size, and still winning, albeit at a somewhat lower rate. As the article says, the implications for camouflage for this approach are very exciting. Has anybody put this approach to a real life trial for an extended period of time, and if so how'd it go?
The Prince
> In the SCORE chapter in BJ attack, it talks
> of back-counting a six-deck shoe, entering
> at a higher count, flat betting with an
> increased unit size, and still winning,
> albeit at a somewhat lower rate. As the
> article says, the implications for
> camouflage for this approach are very
> exciting. Has anybody put this approach to a
> real life trial for an extended period of
> time, and if so how'd it go?
Well, Wong started it all, many years ago. He flat bet $500 a hand, and thus Wonging was born.
Things are different today, and getting away with this might be tougher, given all the surveillance nonsense going on. But, it would be fun to know if anyone has even tried.
Don
> The Prince
Posting Permissions
-*-
Bookmarks