> Again, to be counting in positive mode all
> the time, all you had to do was add an
> arbitrarily large enough number to the IRC
> of, say, -20, for 6 decks. That alone would
> keep you in positive territory throughout
> the shoe.

> There is little logic to reversing how you
> count the high and low cards. That doesn't
> help keep you in positive numbers. In fact,
> it is counter-intuitive (no pun intended) to
> be getting more and more excited as the
> count is getting lower and lower.

> Don

Hi Don:

You forget posts from several years ago from me.

I was always a D and F student in math and had to bribe a teacher to pass me once.

I have a bit a trouble with time tables

That's why a few weeks ago I posted that I should be the poster child for BJ. Because if I can make alot of money doing it, imagine what a normal math person is capable of.

I figure there are several ways for me to do this better, but a person with my math abilities had to do it in a way that worked for me.

On several occasions in the beggining I did it both ways just to confirm that I was at the correct place at the end. I always was.

So I figured it worked for me and I stood with it.

That is also why I never question they whys of what we do. It's much to confusing for a person with my abilities.

But, I make certain I know every play under every condition under every circumstance.

AND, that I have the hootzpa (Don will correct spelling) to follow it all up with the $.

In the Blackjack world of counting, I know my limitations and many weaknesses, so I work around them.

By the way for those of you that don't know what hootzpa is. BALLS



Hollywood