Average gains for varying basic strategy (thousand of a percent)
using only Catch 22 indexes, according to Griffin?s table from page 30.
Insurance 186
16 vs T 95
15 vs T 47
13 vs 2 34
12 vs 4 30
12 vs 3 29
12 vs 6 28
13 vs 3 28
TT vs 6 27
TT vs 5 25
12 vs 2 23
12 vs 5 22
16 vs 9 19
10 vs T 18
11 vs A 13
9 vs 7 10
9 vs 2 8
10 vs A 8
8 vs 5 8
8 vs 6 7
A8 vs 5 5
A8 vs 4 4
Total 674
Given that this table is already weighted to their probabilities of occurrences, our 16 vs T
is responsible only for:
95/674 = .1409 of the total strategic gain available.
And certainly it would be better with CDs for multiple decisions.
Exactly, yes.
Btw, I was sure you got the capabilities to run complexities of this type. No doubts whatsoever!
Appreciated, Norm.
Sincerely
Z
Bookmarks