> This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. BJRM
> Wongs in at a much higher optimal point, for
> K-O, yet still wins less, as expected, than
> UBZ. It doesn't make sense that a more
> powerful count outperforms another for
> play-all yet wins less for back-counting.

You know I have blind faith on my programs

> I'd have to check the SCORE chapter, but I
> doubt that we have any such examples in the
> book. Are you sure that your comparison is
> fully "apples to apples"?

Yes of course I'm comparing apples to apples.
The only difference is that for KO and UBZ2 I used an IRC of -24 (indices were calculated according). I didn't use SBA but my own programs.

If anyone out there wishes to verify the results please don't be shy and go ahead. It would be an interesting finding

Rules and conditions: 6D,S17,DOA,DAS,SPA1,SPL3,NS,5/6,C22 floored,5000 million rounds,spread 1-12.

Sincerely,
Cacarulo