Silks: Cover plays worth it?

[Silks]

Ive read that a camouflage play or cover play is making a wrong play (hitting when standing called for or Vice versa) but does the pit really care if you do these plays at low stakes? How can that make them think youre not counting, are they really watching the games that close if youre just playing low stakes $50.00 or $100.00 max bet? If youre winning will you have the eye on the sky watching and the bosses? That could be an entire team of people watching youre every move! Theres no camo or cover plays in the world that will fool a TEAM of people watching is there? I guess the best is to keep sessions short like Don says.

[Hollywood]

> Ive read that a camouflage play or cover
> play is making a wrong play (hitting when
> standing called for or Vice versa) but does
> the pit really care if you do these plays at
> low stakes? How can that make them think
> youre not counting, are they really watching
> the games that close if youre just playing
> low stakes $50.00 or $100.00 max bet? If
> youre winning will you have the eye on the
> sky watching and the bosses? That could be
> an entire team of people watching youre
> every move! Theres no camo or cover plays in
> the world that will fool a TEAM of people
> watching is there? I guess the best is to
> keep sessions short like Don says.

$100 is the minimum bet. $1000 is the max. Also I would go to a 2nd hand of $1000. That was more of what the question was based on.
I never believe in making bad plays for the sake of camo. Certainly not when I have large bets out there.
I build my bets up gradually and never ever take chips from my pile. I simply double up what I have won and leave them out there.
Actually you reminded me of another question I had. Thanks for the post.

Hollywood