-
brownian bridge: Re: Maybe this will help
> blackjackincolor.com/blackjackeffects2.htm
> Maybe it won't!
> Don
If you mean, data generated by 3-decades-old Intel 286 CPU are a little old,
I agree. and maybe it's equally true to theories based on those data.
anyway, I show you my idea.
Let
D:total deck number
t/(52D):depth of shoe
r:RC before round
r+a:RC after the round
n:number of cards used at the round
assumption 1: "Brownian Bridge" can be used as model for the movement of RC.
assumption 2: EV of the game will be the function of expected value of a/n and variance of a/n.
assumption 3: optimal playing indices will be function of expected value of a/n and variance of a/n.
assumption 4: E(a/n) will be equivalent to TC/52
assumption 5: Var(a/n) will be the function of r, n, t, and 52D.
investigation of these functions will include the answer to floating advantage.
-
G Man: Re: Betting when 4D let vs 2D left at 6D shoe
> But in my very poor understanding, as penetration goes
> very deep,
> uncertainty level will be reduced.
Who said the contrary? This is probably the basics of the floating advantage.
You have a nice handle, you brought Shannon's therory in the discussion but you don't even know what it means...
What's the point you're trying to make?
-
brownian bridge: Re: Betting when 4D let vs 2D left at 6D shoe
> Who said the contrary? This is probably the basics of
> the floating advantage.
> You have a nice handle, you brought Shannon's therory
> in the discussion but you don't even know what it
> means...
> What's the point you're trying to make?
Sorry, now I have no interest in that sort of thing.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks