> For a given session simulation, CVData could report
> the mean and median of the winning sessions as well as
> the losing sessions.

Mean is planned. Median is probably impossible.

> For any wonging simulation, CVData should report how
> many shoes were observed, how many shoes were actually
> played, and the resulting % of shoes played. It would
> also be nice to get some sort of estimate of the
> standard deviation for the # of shoes that are
> actually played. For instance, using a particular
> wonging strategy might result in playing 25% of shoes
> observed, but how unusual of an event would it be to
> observe 100 shoes but only wong into 10 of them? This
> has practical application for tracking spotter
> efficiency for teams.

> Take a look at the charts and tables generated from
> Don's ODP study in BJA3. The more stats CVData
> provides when it comes to wonging sims, the better!

Have to think about this. ODP really requires a lot of separate sims.

> OKAY this one is a special request! Do you think you
> could set-up CVData's wonging simulations to provide
> an estimate of EV, CE, and SD based upon a round by
> round basis? For example, the user inputs the RC when
> the wonger arrives at the table, # decks remaining,
> and # of other players at the table, and location of
> the cut card. Then the software spits out EV, CE, and
> SD for that particular round. If you watch Hot Shoe,
> you will notice that is how the MIT Team tracked and
> evaluated the value of their team play.

> I do believe their method provides more accurate
> results for post-trip analysis. But then again that is
> a lot of info to keep track of.

You might be able to get this with the MRI feature. But, I don't really see the point.

> Not sure if this is there already but include EV/shoe
> and SD/shoe. Also include CE/shoe. It would be nice to
> have a post-sim calculator for CVData simulations.

EV is EV whether by shoe, round, hour, etc. SD/Shoe is included now. Post-sim calculator is planned.

> For CVCX wonging, try to configure it so that
> different counting strategies can be compared at
> different entry points and then the results graphed
> across different pen levels.

Planned.

> For CVData, try and implement the session sims to
> include expenses. For every 'x' rounds played 'y'
> dollars is subtracted. It will be interesting to see
> how this impacts ROR and Goal.

I've always had a problem with this as expenses aren't really per hand.

> CVCX- KO should be able to go back and forth between 1
> and 2 hands and show the optimal schedule.

Not really possible in a post-sim calculator. But planned for CVData.