lagavulin62: cvdata (index)

[lagavulin62]

I generated indexes for hi/lo as a first time test run for 6 deck, das, s17, at 80% penetration, using the flooring method. they came out consistent with wong's numbers but I have a few questions:

1. when indexes are generated, what is the recommended or standard penetration level?

2. should I generate for specific rules or is it better to generate a composite index?

3. how do you order a composite index generation for cvdata? (by composite I am referring to one for multi-deck, all rules)

thanks,

mike

[Don Schlesinger]

> I generated indexes for hi/lo as a first time test run
> for 6 deck, das, s17, at 80% penetration, using the
> flooring method. they came out consistent with wong's
> numbers but I have a few questions:

> 1. when indexes are generated, what is the recommended
> or standard penetration level?

The level you play most frequently. For 6 decks that may be 4.5.

> 2. should I generate for specific rules or is it
> better to generate a composite index?

If you play predominantly one set of rules, do it for them.

> 3. how do you order a composite index generation for
> cvdata? (by composite I am referring to one for
> multi-deck, all rules)

Don't know. Perhaps Norm can help. I'm not sure that's such a good idea anyway.

Don

[Norm Wattenberger]

> 3. how do you order a composite index generation for
> cvdata? (by composite I am referring to one for
> multi-deck, all rules)

There isn't one composite. It depends on how often you play each. Gives me an interesting idea for an addition though.

[lagavulin62]

thanks norm, don for the advice.

next up is unbalanced, I already have some concerns about how best to accomplish this but will wait till I finish.

mike