Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 15

Thread: past crazy: CVData Version 3 planning

  1. #1
    past crazy
    Guest

    past crazy: CVData Version 3 planning

    Hi Norm,
    Can the current version sim the "original and busted bets only rule"? If not, could it be worth the effort adding?
    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Norm Wattenberger
    Guest

    Norm Wattenberger: Re: CVData Version 3 planning


    ENHC and OBO are supported, but not the Australian OBBO. I'll look at what it takes for support.

    > Hi Norm,
    > Can the current version sim the
    > "original and busted bets only
    > rule"? If not, could it be worth the
    > effort adding?
    > Thanks.




  3. #3
    Magician
    Guest

    Magician: OBBO Questions

    > Hi Norm,
    > Can the current version sim the
    > "original and busted bets only
    > rule"? If not, could it be worth the
    > effort adding?
    > Thanks.

    Past Crazy, where you play if you split against a ten or ace, bust the original hand and the dealer gets blackjack, what happens? It seems the correct thing would be not to take any more bets but I believe some places will always take one more bet.

    Also, if you are silly enough to double a hard hand, bust and the dealer gets blackjack you should lose only one bet, correct? What do you think the chances are that the dealer or floorperson will get this right?

  4. #4
    Norm Wattenberger
    Guest

    Norm Wattenberger: Re: OBBO Questions

    I think it's really supposed to be easier for the dealer since the dealer is allowed to take busted split hands (and their bets) off the table immediately. DD bets are handled the same as OBO or hole card with no peek.

    > Past Crazy, where you play if you split
    > against a ten or ace, bust the original hand
    > and the dealer gets blackjack, what happens?
    > It seems the correct thing would be not to
    > take any more bets but I believe some places
    > will always take one more bet.

    > Also, if you are silly enough to double a
    > hard hand, bust and the dealer gets
    > blackjack you should lose only one bet,
    > correct? What do you think the chances are
    > that the dealer or floorperson will get this
    > right?

  5. #5
    Magician
    Guest

    Magician: Re: OBBO Questions

    > I think it's really supposed to be easier
    > for the dealer since the dealer is allowed
    > to take busted split hands (and their bets)
    > off the table immediately.

    Yes, I was trying to establish whether there are in fact two variations of the OBBO rule. Suppose I have 88 vs A, split once and bust the first hand but not the second. The busted hand and bet (which is also the original bet) is always taken at this point. Now, I believe if the dealer has blackjack some places will always take one more bet from the player even though it is not the original bet. This case is so rare I'm not sure if this is house policy or dealer error.

    > DD bets are
    > handled the same as OBO or hole card with no
    > peek.

    Unless the double busts. With OBO the hand and bets should be left on the table until the dealer's hand is resolved. With OBBO the hand and bets should be taken immediately.

  6. #6
    Magician
    Guest

    Magician: Re: OBBO Questions

    I wrote:
    > Also, if you are silly enough to double a
    > hard hand, bust and the dealer gets
    > blackjack you should lose only one bet,
    > correct? What do you think the chances are
    > that the dealer or floorperson will get this
    > right?

    Disregard that. It applies to OBO, not OBBO.

  7. #7
    past crazy
    Guest

    past crazy: Re: OBBO Questions

    > Yes, I was trying to establish whether there
    > are in fact two variations of the OBBO rule.
    > Suppose I have 88 vs A, split once and bust
    > the first hand but not the second. The
    > busted hand and bet (which is also the
    > original bet) is always taken at this point.
    > Now, I believe if the dealer has blackjack
    > some places will always take one more bet
    > from the player even though it is not the
    > original bet. This case is so rare I'm not
    > sure if this is house policy or dealer
    > error.

    As I understand it, the rule you describe is house policy and the only version in Australia. If you split 88 and bust any hand, you lose both units if dealer gets BJ. If you split 88, DD one hand and bust the other, you lose 2 units and keep one.

    > Unless the double busts. With OBO the hand
    > and bets should be left on the table until
    > the dealer's hand is resolved. With OBBO the
    > hand and bets should be taken immediately.

    I don't know of any game that has OBBO and DA2 together. If there is such a game don't ask me what happens

  8. #8
    Magician
    Guest

    Magician: Re: OBBO Questions

    > As I understand it, the rule you describe is
    > house policy and the only version in
    > Australia. If you split 88 and bust any
    > hand, you lose both units if dealer gets BJ.
    > If you split 88, DD one hand and bust the
    > other, you lose 2 units and keep one.

    Thanks very much. So there's only one variation and it's not so much the original bet that is taken on a dealer blackjack as any bet that's left for the taking.

    > I don't know of any game that has OBBO and
    > DA2 together. If there is such a game don't
    > ask me what happens

    Maybe these places should go ENHC and DA2. Make life easier for everybody.

    I guess the only place to play this combination of rules will be CVBJ.

  9. #9
    MGP
    Guest

    MGP: BBO not OBBO

    > As I understand it, the rule you describe is
    > house policy and the only version in
    > Australia. If you split 88 and bust any
    > hand, you lose both units if dealer gets BJ.
    > If you split 88, DD one hand and bust the
    > other, you lose 2 units and keep one.

    So it's really BBO - i.e. it's Busted Bets plus One.

    That's a real shame since I had just finished adding OBBO to my CA including busted doubles after splits and everything

    So is there a game anywhere that's actually OBBO, i.e. only the actual original bet and busted bets are taken?

    > I don't know of any game that has OBBO and
    > DA2 together. If there is such a game don't
    > ask me what happens

    What are you referring to with DA2? Do you mean double any 2 or double after split or something else?

    Thanks in advance,
    MGP

  10. #10
    past crazy
    Guest

    past crazy: Re: OBBO Questions

    > Thanks very much. So there's only one
    > variation

    Actually don?t quote me on that, I can?t account for all 13 casinos but I think the mix up comes from a misleading name of the rule

    > and it's not so much the original
    > bet that is taken on a dealer blackjack as
    > any bet that's left for the taking.

    Yep.

  11. #11
    past crazy
    Guest

    past crazy: Re: BBO not OBBO

    > So it's really BBO - i.e. it's Busted Bets
    > plus One.

    Yep. Another way I've heard it is "lose 1 unit to non busted hands," which also makes more sense.

    > That's a real shame since I had just
    > finished adding OBBO to my CA including
    > busted doubles after splits and everything
    >

    Ah... Bummer!

    > So is there a game anywhere that's actually
    > OBBO, i.e. only the actual original bet and
    > busted bets are taken?

    Not that I know, but I can't be 100% sure.

    > What are you referring to with DA2? Do you
    > mean double any 2 or double after split or
    > something else?

    Yes, I was referring to DA2 as in double any first 2 cards. Most casinos here are D9 (double totals of 9, 10 & 11 only) therefore making it impossible to bust any doubled hands.

    > Thanks in advance,
    > MGP

    No worries, any time!

  12. #12
    Ed Tice
    Guest

    Ed Tice: Re: CVData Version 3 planning

    Hi Norm,

    Speaking of enhancement requests (or maybe this is a feature I don't know about!), any chance of getting CVData to simulate any "hand interaction" situations? Like buying (or selling) a split card.. .jumping in on doubles for less...

    Ed

    > Hi Norm,
    > Can the current version sim the
    > "original and busted bets only
    > rule"? If not, could it be worth the
    > effort adding?
    > Thanks.

  13. #13
    Norm Wattenberger
    Guest

    Norm Wattenberger: Fascinating idea


    A bit difficult to specify. How much is the other player(s) betting. Have to give this some thought.

    > Hi Norm,

    > Speaking of enhancement requests (or maybe
    > this is a feature I don't know about!), any
    > chance of getting CVData to simulate any
    > "hand interaction" situations?
    > Like buying (or selling) a split card..
    > .jumping in on doubles for less...

    > Ed




Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.