-
zfuse: cvcx and KO running count
The sim screen of cvcx only shows true count, but I am using KO with an irc of 10. How do I adjust the options to make it work? Also, I need to set the 'lowest count tracked' to 28, but the highest it can go is 20...and even set it to 20, the sim table doesn't make sense. Please help.
-
Norm Wattenberger: Re: cvcx and KO running count
For running count systems the screen shows running counts, not true counts. I changed the label to avoid confusion. I have also increased the range for 'lowest count tracked.' There is a free update available at the below:
-
zfuse: Re: cvcx and KO running count
Downloaded and tried. Great! Just one question left: how to set the IRC, or, how to interpret the count table? For example, when the table shows the count of 22, what's the equivalent KO count according to my IRC of 10?
-
Norm Wattenberger: Re: cvcx and KO running count
Set the IRC in the user strategy that you have created. It is on the Counts tab. Then the tables will reflect your IRC.
-
Parker: I'm impressed
A software user posts a question about the software on a message board.
Barely an hour later, he receives a response from the developer, directing him to an update that is already in place.
He posts a follow-up question, and receives a response four minutes later.
All this is happening on a Saturday.
Now that's what I call service.
-
Don Schlesinger: One more thing ...
> All this is happening on a Saturday.
> Now that's what I call service.
You didn't mention one thing: the price for all of this! :-)
Don
-
zfuse: Re: cvcx and KO running count
> Set the IRC in the user strategy that you
> have created. It is on the Counts tab. Then
> the tables will reflect your IRC.
I did that Norm, but the count reflected in the CVCX sim table is approximately 10 numbers lower than the result created by using John's BJRM. Is this because the trial version has randomly changed the W/L rate? Also, may I suggest that in the future version a penetration of 4.8/8, or 60% be created in the option's screen, if not for playing, but just for game comparisons?
-
Norm Wattenberger: Re: cvcx and KO running count
> I did that Norm, but the count reflected in
> the CVCX sim table is approximately 10
> numbers lower than the result created by
> using John's BJRM. Is this because the trial
> version has randomly changed the W/L rate?
The W/L numbers in the trial version have no meaning.
> Also, may I suggest that in the future
> version a penetration of 4.8/8, or 60% be
> created in the option's screen, if not for
> playing, but just for game comparisons?
Woof. I'll look at it. But this is an awful game.
-
zfuse: Thanks for the prompt replies *NM*
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks