What are the playing efficiency, insurance and betting correlation for this level 4 count balanced, ace reckoned count?
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A
2 2 3 4 3 2 0 -1 -3 -3
What are the playing efficiency, insurance and betting correlation for this level 4 count balanced, ace reckoned count?
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A
2 2 3 4 3 2 0 -1 -3 -3
BC: 1.00
PE: .57
IC: .75
How could the BC be 1.00, not .99?
> How could the BC be 1.00, not .99?
It's rounded, and the original value is at least 0.995.
Don
The UstonSS manual claims that Arnold calced UstonSS with a BC of .9954 with an 'improved formula' for the only counting system rounding to 1.00. But, the manual also shows the original BC formula resulting in .994; the same as CV gives and bjmath shows.
Posting Permissions
-*-
Bookmarks