> Anything is possible, and Indian casinos can be
> whacky. But this doesn't pass my smell test.
> If it's on the level, the comments by Parker, Coug and
> Monkey are excellent.
> But deeply dealt DD's? 1-20, for 4 days?? Sniff-sniff.

Keep sniffing instead of playing. Maybe the casino won't change this game and I can go back and play it in 6 months.

At another Indian Casino I have been spreading 1-20 for months with two long (6-8 hours) sessions per week. Penetration varies by dealers (who keep their own tokes) from 50% to 80%. No sniff.

> Wait a minute, you're using a PROGRESSION system? In a
> non-AP'able game? 30 units? Sniff-sniff

On using a progression for cover see Arnold Snyder's article on Oscar's Grind at blackjackforumonline. Baccarat is countable but the counting of baccarat is not very profitable - see Thorp's Mathematics of Gambling and Peter Griffin's Theory of Blackjack. On using baccarat for cover see Ian Anderson's Burning the Tables. The 1-30 spread that I referred to obviously related to blackjack; you don't spread bets as in blackjack using Oscar's Grind to play baccarat.

> Maybe on an average California table you can do that
> with a good act for 40 minutes. But allegedly doing
> that on the best game -by far- in the whole STATE, for
> 4 days... that takes more than table image and act.
> I'm skeptical that a progression player can pull off
> an AP move like that.

Calling me a progression player is like calling Ian Anderson a baccarat player.

> I agree with the poster below, that if all that
> happened is they verbally 'implied' you were cheating,
> with NO physical contact or detention, it ain't that
> bad. Roll with it. Even a 1-800-THE-LAW-2 lawyer
> wouldn't pursue a case that weak.
> Fuggedaboudit.

"It ain't that bad" ain't a legal analysis.