> Are the baseline rules 6D S17 DOA NDAS NS OBO SPL3?

Yes.

> I'm wondering if it's SPL1 since that's about a 0.03%
> difference...

No, SPL3.

> I'm not sure why the 6D S17 values would be so far off
> then (-0.520 vs -0.546). Adding rules one at a time in
> the order you presented plus the SPL difference I get
> the following:

> 6D S17 DOA NDAS NS OBO SPL1: -0.554%
> SPL3: -0.520% (Diff 0.034%)

The problem is right there. See BJA3, p. 394. Either way, T-D, or C-D, your -0.52% seems too good for the player.

> DAS: -0.378% (Diff 0.142%)

Fine.

> ENHC: -0.492% (Diff -0.114%)

Not exact, but close enough.

> ES: 0.152% (Diff 0.644%)

> Keep in mind that my TD values are NOT keeping the
> strategy identical - they are calculating the best
> strategy for the given rules. That could also be
> another difference.

Again, I can't think of anything you'd do that would be BETTER. there's something wrong with your off-the-top, base rules edge.

> I also didn't compare moving the
> order of the rules around to see if that made any
> difference to the "Diff" values except for
> one below:

> 6D OBO NDAS to 6D OBO DAS: Diff 0.142%
> 6D ENHC NDAS to 6D ENHC DAS: Diff 0.140%

> So the order matters a little bit, but the net with my
> calcs is the same taken all together. If the numbers
> are taken all from baseline though, then interactions
> will cause a difference as above.

> Right - see above.

Check some of the other sites for the base rules and edges. Yours just seems to be too good for 6D.

Don