Hi Don,
A rule I had just added was messing up the shoe before the double ev's were calculated. I've removed the new feature for now and it should be fine and exact now.
My values will differ from Cacarulo's slightly because I'm using a TD strategy and not the BJA3 strategy. I'll also include the 2C strategy figures for a closer comparison to the BJA3 numbers since the BJA3 values use the CD figures.
TD Diff TC Diff
6D S17 OBO DOA NDAS NS -0.5476290% -0.5457572%
DAS -0.4059224% 0.1417066% -0.4040622% 0.1416949%
ENHC -0.5176368% -0.1117144% -0.5152312% -0.1111690%
ES 0.1260835% 0.6437203% 0.1263671% 0.6415983%
.
The differences in the ES and ENHC changes are interaction effects. I double checked the changes in 2C values from 6D OBO NDAS NS SPL3 to 6D OBO NDAS ES SPL3 (i.e. +0.629) and the ENHC from OBO change value (-0.109) and got the same as the BJA3 values.
Thanks for pointing out the error, I would've found it eventually when I double checked everything when/if I finish, but it was something I just added and didn't realize it messed things up.
MGP
Bookmarks