Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: AdvantageRay: Single Deck

  1. #1
    AdvantageRay
    Guest

    AdvantageRay: Single Deck

    While perusing Wongs CBJN, I ran across a single deck that aparently pays even money on BJs but deals all the way through to the final card. I know giving up the blackjack 3-2 edge is huge, and it is listed as a basic strategy casino edge of 2.5%, but couldnt a counter make up that edge quite easily with the 100% penetration? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    OUCHEZ
    Guest

    OUCHEZ: Don't play it...

    > While perusing Wongs CBJN, I ran across a
    > single deck that aparently pays even money
    > on BJs but deals all the way through to the
    > final card. I know giving up the blackjack
    > 3-2 edge is huge, and it is listed as a
    > basic strategy casino edge of 2.5%, but
    > couldnt a counter make up that edge quite
    > easily with the 100% penetration? Any
    > thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

    First off you are sending the wrong signal to the casino, that you will play this bastardized game and that you are a sucker!

    Second, if you can play with a 2% edge, which I doubt you can, you still have given away a half percent to the casino, no advantage there!

    Just say no!

    Regards,
    Ouchez.

  3. #3
    SOTSOG
    Guest

    SOTSOG: Re: Don't play it...

    > First off you are sending the wrong signal
    > to the casino, that you will play this
    > bastardized game and that you are a sucker!

    > Second, if you can play with a 2% edge,
    > which I doubt you can, you still have given
    > away a half percent to the casino, no
    > advantage there!

    > Just say no!

    > Regards,
    > Ouchez.

    You are correct. The spread between min./max. bet doesn't allow for a super big end-game bet when there are strange subsets left in the last few cards.

    Even if you are a superman counter, you would still be taking a 1/2% beating.

  4. #4
    Parker
    Guest

    Parker: Agreed - Don't bother

    > While perusing Wongs CBJN, I ran across a
    > single deck that aparently pays even money
    > on BJs but deals all the way through to the
    > final card. I know giving up the blackjack
    > 3-2 edge is huge, and it is listed as a
    > basic strategy casino edge of 2.5%, but
    > couldnt a counter make up that edge quite
    > easily with the 100% penetration? Any
    > thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

    While it is commonly said that good penetration will overcome bad rules, this is an extreme case.

    The obvious problem is, of course, the huge house edge.

    Less obvious, but equally important is that eliminating the blackjack bonus changes the entire structure of the game. Without it, aces are much less valuable to the player, and even 10's become less valuable.

    In other words, card counting becomes less effective. A positive count means less.

    Bottom line: Fuggedaboudit.


  5. #5
    AdvantageRay
    Guest

    AdvantageRay: Re: Agreed - Don't bother

    > While it is commonly said that good
    > penetration will overcome bad rules, this is
    > an extreme case.

    > The obvious problem is, of course, the huge
    > house edge.

    > Less obvious, but equally important is that
    > eliminating the blackjack bonus changes the
    > entire structure of the game. Without it,
    > aces are much less valuable to the player,
    > and even 10's become less valuable.

    > In other words, card counting becomes less
    > effective. A positive count means less.

    > Bottom line: Fuggedaboudit.

    Thanks everybody. Being a relative beginner its great to have access to a site like this where I can get informed, intelligent and accurate responses, especially so quickly! Thanks again...

  6. #6
    Norm Wattenberger
    Guest

    Norm Wattenberger: Zweitenkartenspiel


    Forgive my spelling. Does the game say DE in its description? If so it is double exposure. Both dealer cards are seen. This can be beaten, but the strategy is very different. The Stratosphere used to play this to the last card long ago.



  7. #7
    Donny
    Guest

    Donny: Re: Zweitenkartenspiel?

    > Forgive my spelling.

    Spelling is okay but what do you want to say?

  8. #8
    Don Schlesinger
    Guest

    Don Schlesinger: Re: Zweikartenspiel

    > Forgive my spelling.

    Just take the "ten" out!

    Don

  9. #9
    Don Schlesinger
    Guest

    Don Schlesinger: Re: Zweitenkartenspiel?

    > Spelling is okay but what do you want to
    > say?

    Spelling isn't okay. See above.

    Don

  10. #10
    Norm Wattenberger
    Guest

    Norm Wattenberger: Re: Zweitenkartenspiel?


    > Spelling is okay but what do you want to
    > say?

    Zwei karten speil, two card play or game. It is the original name for double exposure BJ (DBX.) Both dealer cards are up, but BJ pays even money. Obviously the strategy is completely different since you are looking at both dealer cards. For example, you hit a hard-20 against a 21 and double a 5 against a dealer 14-16.




  11. #11
    Donny
    Guest

    Donny: Re: Zweitenkartenspiel?

    > Zwei karten speil, two card play or game.

    Got it
    Of course Don is right with suggesting "Zweikartenspiel" instead of "Zwei-ten-kartenspiel". I just was not able to figure out what you were trying to say.

    Forgive my persistence: does that mean Double Exposure is (sometimes) called "two card play (or game)" in the U.S. and why did you translate it into German?

  12. #12
    Random Poster
    Guest

    Random Poster: Re: Zweitenkartenspiel?

    > Zwei karten speil, two card play or game. It

    Zweikartenspiel (2nd ei-->ie ).... in BJ Secrets...

    > is the original name for double exposure BJ
    > (DBX.) Both dealer cards are up, but BJ pays
    > even money. Obviously the strategy is
    > completely different since you are looking
    > at both dealer cards. For example, you hit a
    > hard-20 against a 21 and double a 5 against
    > a dealer 14-16.

  13. #13
    Norm Wattenberger
    Guest

    Norm Wattenberger: Re: Zweitenkartenspiel?

    > Forgive my persistence: does that mean
    > Double Exposure is (sometimes) called
    > "two card play (or game)" in the
    > U.S. and why did you translate it into
    > German?

    That was what Richard Epstein called it 25 or so years ago.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.